Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

ASU

124678

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,653 Founders Club
    BallSacked said:

    I guess it is when you are trying to argue 2 is easier than 4.

    So you're saying the Pac 6 of the Pac 12 is better than the Big 10 of the Big 12?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,710
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    BallSacked said:

    I'm not sure if your eyes as good as mine.

    Your link shows the Pac12 South as a better conference than Big12.

    Yes, but the Pac-12 as a whole is worse than the Big 12.
    No
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    RaceBannon said:

    BallSacked said:

    I guess it is when you are trying to argue 2 is easier than 4.

    So you're saying the Pac 6 of the Pac 12 is better than the Big 10 of the Big 12?
    I'm saying that link doesnt support that the big12 is better than the pac12. Because 1) Stats are for losers. And 2) Half of the conference in his link is two spots better than the big12, and the other half is two spots worse.

    But he says math is hard, so maybe he really means it? I'm honestly not sure.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,710
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Puppy has never made a stupid post, and id agree if I ever did

    Sounds like PLSS has multiple personalities and they're both pretty fucking stupid.


    Why do you hate his brother?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,653 Founders Club
    BallSacked said:

    RaceBannon said:

    BallSacked said:

    I guess it is when you are trying to argue 2 is easier than 4.

    So you're saying the Pac 6 of the Pac 12 is better than the Big 10 of the Big 12?
    I'm saying that link doesnt support that the big12 is better than the pac12. Because 1) Stats are for losers. And 2) Half of the conference in his link is two spots better than the big12, and the other half is two spots worse.

    But he says math is hard, so maybe he really means it? I'm honestly not sure.

    That was my attempt at math humor

    There is nothing funny about math I guess
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,427 Standard Supporter
    If nice weather and sluts is a player's priorities, UCLA and USC are superior. LA isn't a desert and has just as many, if not more sluts. Arizona is a fucking armpit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,164 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2014
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    It looks like Graham isn't going anywhere for the time being.

    This really annoying Duck who lived in Phoenix for a year or two used to talk about their wasted potential a few years ago and I sort of agreed with him. That's a relatively large metro area. There are always slutty girls a stone's throw away. The academic standards aren't high. They can plug in JUCO guys. SoCal (recruits) are close, and Texas isn't real far away.

    With Graham and Sark at the Condoms, they can probably be a force for a few years. I'm not saying they'll be Oregon south (vomit at giving Oregon that kind of credit) or SC during their top years, but I see them being a consistent top 25 team who can win 8-11 regular season games and maybe get lucky and get to the RB one year. It doesn't seem like they'll fade away and go 5-7 for two years like they usually do. Graham isn't going to let that happen.

    Good post Billy but we've been saying the same sleeping giant bullshit about ASU since 1987. Yet they are good enough for a rose bowl every 4 or 5 years. I suspect more of the same. Especially now that the pac12 is so damn deep. Its a deeper conference t han the 14-team SEC, not good for a dynasty in the desert. Shit they arent even the best team in their own state.

    They aren't going to become what USC was, but with Graham there, they can be pretty consistent which they haven't been since the 70s and some of the 80s. Of course, he has a history of fleeing to better jobs, but he did contribute a lot of money to their stadium renovation. I don't really like them, but if it's between ASU and Oregon, Kal, WSU, and Oregon St., I'll take the team that's a few states away and isn't an annoying upstart who never did shit before the 90s.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,665 Standard Supporter
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I don't really get the sleeping giant stuff with ASU.

    There are 2 giants, 1 sleeping, in the Pac-12 south, and they're both in LA.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter