Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sark never had 3 first team All Americans in 5 years
sarktastic
Member Posts: 9,208
Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.
Comments
-
Sark's guys, Kikaha would have won the heisman if Wilcox was still DC so I don't know what you're happy about.
-
Has UW had more than two AAs since the '91 team?
-
Bullshit. These 3 are their own guys. They attribute their success to Chris Peterson. The only thing Sark did to help them was leave
-
Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.
-
This is doog talk. We could argue all day about whether it was Sark's recruiting, Wilcox or Kwiatkowski's development, Petersen's inspiration, etc. Who gives a fuck. We're 8-5 with a 4-5 conference record. Individual accolades don't mean shit if there's no winning attached.
-
Agreed, if we were 10-3 I'd be all in on this 3AA circle jerk, but at 8-5 it's almost embarrassing.
As always, win alot of fucking games then pop off. -
Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?sarktastic said:Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.
Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.
-
And we would still have Marcus FarriaDoogles said:Sark's guys, Kikaha would have won the heisman if Wilcox was still DC so I don't know what you're happy about.
-
Ahh yes, those 4 tackles and half a sack he got at Murray St would have really put us over the top.bananasnblondes said:
And we would still have Marcus FarriaDoogles said:Sark's guys, Kikaha would have won the heisman if Wilcox was still DC so I don't know what you're happy about.
#Farriathedooglegend -
Fucking doogs.
It was SARK who fucked these three. Had SARK been able to evaluate, recruit and develop a complete team, these 3 would have enjoyed the team success their individual performances warranted. -
Peterman can coach. All three attribute their success to Chris Peterson.EwaDawg said:
Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?sarktastic said:Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.
Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.
-
Because sanctions. And youth. Don't forget the youth.EwaDawg said:
Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?sarktastic said:Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.
Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.
-
Youre so full of shit Vegas. A fucking genie didnt magically appear and make them better players. You happen to notice kikahamora's sack total the year before? Shaq simply matured into the player he was destined to be, and got a chance at TB. Shelton matured as a senior who didnt get a redshirt year. Oh, dont forget Peters who was a likely AA, Sankey if he stayed. Thats 5 and we still would have stunk. Myrus is the problem here. What are those humping puppies at dawgman feeding you guys over there Vegas?Vegasdawg said:Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.
-
Shelton and Shaq were shells of themselves last year. Kikaha has always been a monster but you have to credit this years staff in the development of Shelton and Shaq. Shaq probably just needed a little more confidence than anything, people were saying he was a disappointment when Sark was here.GreenRiverGatorz said:This is doog talk. We could argue all day about whether it was Sark's recruiting, Wilcox or Kwiatkowski's development, Petersen's inspiration, etc. Who gives a fuck. We're 8-5 with a 4-5 conference record. Individual accolades don't mean shit if there's no winning attached.
-
I really underestimated the toll that the sanctions would have on the team this year. In no way am I making an excuse for it, the results fall on the coaching staff and ultimately me. I can tell you we are very excited and optimistic about the future with the guys we have. With all we have been through with the sanctions this year we are going to be one tough ass football team next year!TommySQC said:
Because sanctions. And youth. Don't forget the youth.EwaDawg said:
Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?sarktastic said:Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.
Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark. -
I'm sure these AA players are on Sark's website for putting them into the NFL already....
-
Post. Of. The. Year.GreenRiverGatorz said:This is doog talk. We could argue all day about whether it was Sark's recruiting, Wilcox or Kwiatkowski's development, Petersen's inspiration, etc. Who gives a fuck. We're 8-5 with a 4-5 conference record. Individual accolades don't mean shit if there's no winning attached.
-
PL_SS, still a fucking idiot.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Youre so full of shit Vegas. A fucking genie didnt magically appear and make them better players. You happen to notice kikahamora's sack total the year before? Shaq simply matured into the player he was destined to be, and got a chance at TB. Shelton matured as a senior who didnt get a redshirt year. Oh, dont forget Peters who was a likely AA, Sankey if he stayed. Thats 5 and we still would have stunk. Myrus is the problem here. What are those humping puppies at dawgman feeding you guys over there Vegas?Vegasdawg said:Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.
-
I'm in complete agreement with Nacho.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
PL_SS, still a fucking idiot.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Youre so full of shit Vegas. A fucking genie didnt magically appear and make them better players. You happen to notice kikahamora's sack total the year before? Shaq simply matured into the player he was destined to be, and got a chance at TB. Shelton matured as a senior who didnt get a redshirt year. Oh, dont forget Peters who was a likely AA, Sankey if he stayed. Thats 5 and we still would have stunk. Myrus is the problem here. What are those humping puppies at dawgman feeding you guys over there Vegas?Vegasdawg said:Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.
-
Well… He probably is an upgrade. But it is all hypotheticals until the wins start coming in.EwaDawg said:
Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?sarktastic said:Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.
Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.
4-5>5-4 -
Always knew Atoe would do Sark proud!
