Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I like to say this year will be the first real NCAA football champion..
Comments
-
Canard types are a huge reason why I want to ducks to lose every game in every sport every year.
Quookist quook to ever quook. -
The Ducks cannot help it that you guys have sucked hard for 14 straight years.
Sucking "hard" would imply effort.
-
I'd rather you want us to lose every game, whether I am the reason or not.MikeDamone said:Canard types are a huge reason why I want to ducks to lose every game in every sport every year.
Quookist quook to ever quook.
Forestall requiring that Cialis/Viagra combo hit. -
well if you're going to be too lazy to research it then don't post it. in this case, it was FS.LawDawg1 said:Canard said:
No. However, if Oregon takes it this year, they will have had the toughest path ever to claim one. If you think that aspect of the playoff is debatable, you're fucking delusional.bananasnblondes said:So if the ducks win it this year they are the greatest football program of all time, correct? They would have won the most national championships.
The sad thing is there are many many duck fans who think this way. Just like the "nothing before 1998 counts" shit that the dumbfuck in this thread has already posted.
There's none of that, "we'd have killed BYU" or "Miami didn't deserve to share," and other hypothetical shit.
Cut through the defending and undefeated champ and then take out the preeminent program of the era if Alabama is in Dallas?
That trophy will be unassailably earned if the Ducks pull it off.
Ugh, your schedule this year, even with the two bowl game playoffs (assuming you win) would not be the toughest path to claim a NC. I'm too lazy to research it but i seriously doubt your schedule matches up the the toughest ever. Shit, I think UW 1991 was harder than yours this year with playing SC, Cal, Nebraska, Michigan. Michigan State, Arizona (lol), Florida State, and Alabama not that much different.
SC was 3-8 in 1991. and based on doogic I've heard before, if Cal was the next tuffest team in the conference that year, and it was, then the Pac had to have been down. Right?
Pac had 3 teams in the top 20 in 91 - UW, Cal and UCLA. Stanford made the low end of some top 25 lists. I'm liking the Pac 12s chances of having about that kind of representation.
The road game at Nebraska was tuff. Oregon's home game against Michigan State was tuff. Exactly equal? No. But then again, that same Nebraska team got ass raped by Miami and didn't crack 100 yards rushing, RUSHING, for the game. That's right, I'll say it again: a Nebraska team that rushed for a game TOTAL of 80 yards. Maybe not that tuff.
Finally, Michigan was a joke compared to what Oregon will face if, IF, they win the title, which I rather doubt. Florida State hung 51 fucking points on them AT Michigan. Juggernauts do not give up 51 pts. at home. Their 31 pts. had a lot of garbage time scoring too - I watched the game with much interest. I know. Florida State kicked Michigan's ASS at Michigan. That Michigan team would get boat raced against either FSU or Bama. Against Oregon too for that matter.
You cannot make this FS argument and call yourself a lawyer. I'm just a pretend lawyer and just handed you your ass.
I don't know about THE tuffest road ever in the Pac. That's a mouthful, which Canard is known for. But he is absolutely right and you have to be nuclear FS and gay to dispute that Oregon would have earned the mother fucking shit out of that trophy were they to get it.
It's all moot though - they won't. But if they were to, then they'd be able to claim it's a pretty fucking legit trophy. People have been whining for this fucking playoff for eons. Well, here it is. Enjoy.
In 1991, Washington would have had to go through Miami and, likely, Florida State to get it. Maybe they would have. If so, THAT would have been harder than what they had to do. Likewise with Miami.
Easy Peasy Japaneasy. Cook it!