Auburndawg's Preseason PAC-12 Power Rankings!
Comments
-
An easier schedule does not a better team make.
-
Everyone thinks they'll be slightly improved 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6Auburndawg said:Gentlemen, you are not being realistic. Do any of you seriously think this team won't be at least slightly improved this year? The schedule is a little easier. We were very close to 9 wins last year. It wouldn't take much improvement for this team to get to 9 or 10 wins.
-
The conference road schedule is actually much harder. All four of our road games will be against bowl teams. There are no Cal, Colorado, or WSU's this year. There's a reason why we are underdogs in five games according to Vegas.Auburndawg said:Gentlemen, you are not being realistic. Do any of you seriously think this team won't be at least slightly improved this year? The schedule is a little easier. We were very close to 9 wins last year. It wouldn't take much improvement for this team to get to 9 or 10 wins.
Unless something drastically changes, we will lose all four of those road games. Add Oregon and there is a fifth loss. That's a 7-5 season assuming we dont blow another game (we normally do). Being slightly improved likely won't matter. This is a 6-8 win team. You are the one not being realistic.
-
Let it play out
-
Really? Win 6 of 7 at home, and 2 of 5 on the road, and win the bowl game. That's 9. That doesn't seem crazy to me.
For the record I think we will do better than that, and that would be the bare minimum, I would expect in year 5. -
Look if we had a REAL head coach I'd expect 9-10 wins.Auburndawg said:Really? Win 6 of 7 at home, and 2 of 5 on the road, and win the bowl game. That's 9. That doesn't seem crazy to me.
For the record I think we will do better than that, and that would be the bare minimum, I would expect in year 5.
Since we have Sark I expect 7-8 wins. I actually think that fucker will get 8 wins so he can get an extension and we'll be stuck with him forever. -
Yes, I predicted an 8-4 regular season. To do any better than that the coaching and player development needs to improve. Why would anyone expect that when, except for a few minor exceptions, it hasn't happened?Auburndawg said:Gentlemen, you are not being realistic. Do any of you seriously think this team won't be at least slightly improved this year? The schedule is a little easier. We were very close to 9 wins last year. It wouldn't take much improvement for this team to get to 9 or 10 wins.
-
Thanks for proving how shitty and worthless preseason rankings are.
-
UW was also very close to 5 wins last year. It wouldn't take much deprovement for this to get to 4-8.Auburndawg said:Gentlemen, you are not being realistic. Do any of you seriously think this team won't be at least slightly improved this year? The schedule is a little easier. We were very close to 9 wins last year. It wouldn't take much improvement for this team to get to 9 or 10 wins.
-
anyone that addresses themselves in the 3rd person deserves to DIAFF. HTH.
-
Take this shit to Dawgman where it belongs.
-
Editor's note:
There will be REAL Power Rankings posted next week at this time, when we actually know something about the 2013 teams. -
Mooser42 said:
Take this shit to Dawgman where it belongs.
-
ASU should share 3rd with UCLA. UW at this time should sit no higher than 6th.
-
Slightly improved? Very well could be. So what?
This is not a good team with one of the worst coaches in the conference. To win 10 games, you'll have to be good. There is a Grand Coulee like gap between a 7 - 5 team that got ass raped several times and a BCS contender of 10 - 2.
We'll be having the same conversation next year when the frat boy eakes out 7 or 8 wins. Husky Football is dead as long as Cream Puff is here.Auburndawg said:Gentlemen, you are not being realistic. Do any of you seriously think this team won't be at least slightly improved this year? The schedule is a little easier. We were very close to 9 wins last year. It wouldn't take much improvement for this team to get to 9 or 10 wins.
-
Why do you hate abundance?Steve_Bowman said:Slightly improved? Very well could be. So what?
This is not a good team with one of the worst coaches in the conference. To win 10 games, you'll have to be good. There is a Grand Coulee like gap between a 7 - 5 team that got ass raped several times and a BCS contender of 10 - 2.
We'll be having the same conversation next year when the frat boy eakes out 7 or 8 wins. Husky Football is dead as long as Cream Puff AND Pool Boy is here.Auburndawg said:Gentlemen, you are not being realistic. Do any of you seriously think this team won't be at least slightly improved this year? The schedule is a little easier. We were very close to 9 wins last year. It wouldn't take much improvement for this team to get to 9 or 10 wins.
-
I've always had issues with abundance.
This is a good example. What else could you ask for if we go 8 - 4? What a wonderful turn-around after 0 - 12 five years ago.