Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Auburndawg's Preseason PAC-12 Power Rankings!
Auburndawg
Member Posts: 362
Just a couple of notes for the uninitiated. These are the official PAC-12 Power Rankings and will be updated after the end of the last PAC-12 game each week. Immitation is not appreciated. Also, Power Rankings are not the same thing as the current standings, but rather reflects how well each team is playing at that moment. Strength of opponents matters. Finally, keep in mind that gaps between teams matter. With that, here we go:
Auburndawg sees two distinct tiers in the PAC to begin the season, and, unfortunately, until proven otherwise, Duckdynasty and the usurpers from Palo Alto remain on top.
1. Oregon. It burns Auburndawg's fingers to have to type that. Someone make them go away.
2. Stanford.
T3. WASHINGTON, USC, UCLA. Three teams with major talent and major coaching questions. If sanity is to return and LA and Seattle are to resume their rightful place as the centers of power in west coast football, pray that Sark, Mora and Kiffin mature into coaches worthy of these three great football schools.
T6. Oregon State, ASU. Less elite talent, but solid coaching.
8. Utah. Very little real PAC-12 talent. But these guys are well coached and not use to losing. Yet.
9. Arizona. Carey makes them dangerous
10. Cal. Remember when Tedford was a genius?
11. WSU. The only drama here is, when does the Pirate King of Poop Island implode?
12. Colorado. Still suffering a Skippy hangover.
Auburndawg sees two distinct tiers in the PAC to begin the season, and, unfortunately, until proven otherwise, Duckdynasty and the usurpers from Palo Alto remain on top.
1. Oregon. It burns Auburndawg's fingers to have to type that. Someone make them go away.
2. Stanford.
T3. WASHINGTON, USC, UCLA. Three teams with major talent and major coaching questions. If sanity is to return and LA and Seattle are to resume their rightful place as the centers of power in west coast football, pray that Sark, Mora and Kiffin mature into coaches worthy of these three great football schools.
T6. Oregon State, ASU. Less elite talent, but solid coaching.
8. Utah. Very little real PAC-12 talent. But these guys are well coached and not use to losing. Yet.
9. Arizona. Carey makes them dangerous
10. Cal. Remember when Tedford was a genius?
11. WSU. The only drama here is, when does the Pirate King of Poop Island implode?
12. Colorado. Still suffering a Skippy hangover.
Comments
-
nobody gives a shit exceot auburndawg
-
UW does not have major talent
-
Wait Colorado still blames Rick even tho they went to a BCS game afte his departure???
-
1) Oregon
2) Stanford
3) UCLA
4) USC
5) OSU
T6) ASU/UW
8) Arizona
9) Cal
10) Utah
11) WSU
12) Colorado -
anyone putting UW above ASU and UCLA is crazy. And BTW Utah sux, and Arizona is way better
-
Arizona won 8 games and plungered us last year. And Rich Rod>Sark. Should be above us.
-
This is not last year. Add Tanigawa, Jamora, Callier, Riva, Kevin Smith, maybe Kohler at some point, and a year of experience to last year's team. We return more starters than anyone else.
Sorry to be positive, but even Sark is going to have hard time screwing this team up. -
Returning starters is one of the most overrated stats in CFB. Our coaches didn't change, our talent didn't change. We just keep the same mediocre players and coaches for another year.
-
FTFYAuburndawg said:This is not last year. Add Tanigawa, Jamora, Callier, Riva, Kevin Smith, maybe Kohler at some point, and a year of experience to last year's team. We return more starters than anyone else.
Sorry to be positive,butevenSark is going tohave hard time screwingscrew this team up. Expect 7-6 with three or four plungers
-
Right. Because 19 year old freshmen don't improve once they become 22 year old SRs.CollegeDoog said:Returning starters is one of the most overrated stats in CFB. .
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
