How can we compete
Comments
-
Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.IrishDawg22 said:
Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?haie said:
Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.IrishDawg22 said:
Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.haie said:I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.
This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?
And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.
Get the fuck out of here with total yards in the fucking pac. Put 7's on the board or GTFO. We had nothing to lean on in that regard.
It's as if you didn't see that the opponent just stacked the box and dared UW to beat them with terrible receivers and quarterbacks. Hell, our runningbacks aren't even complete backs. -
haie said:
Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.IrishDawg22 said:
Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?haie said:
Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.IrishDawg22 said:
Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.haie said:I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.
This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?
And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.
Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.
How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another. -
If you cant see that Petermen gifted the Arizona game to Rich Rod to give the South the best chance to beat (Wh)Oregon, then I can't help you
-
Peters isn't on the team anymore, and isn't a team player.Mosster47 said:haie said:
Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.IrishDawg22 said:
Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?haie said:
Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.IrishDawg22 said:
Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.haie said:I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.
This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?
And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.
Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.
How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another.
And Shaq is a fucking linebacker. Jesus Christ -
haie said:Mosster47 said:haie said:
Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.IrishDawg22 said:
Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?haie said:
Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.IrishDawg22 said:
Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.haie said:I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.
This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?
And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.
Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.
How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another.
And Shaq is a fucking linebacker. Jesus Christ
Yeah, but still -
upvoted just because I *snickered*IrishDawg22 said:
Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.haie said:I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.
-
Sounds like we competed then.IrishDawg22 said:
Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?haie said:
Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.IrishDawg22 said:
Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.haie said:I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.
This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?
And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.
Make up your mind -
You're really FSMosster47 said:haie said:
Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.IrishDawg22 said:
Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?haie said:
Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.IrishDawg22 said:
Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.haie said:I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.
This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?
And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.
Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.
How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another. -
You really think a 10-2 team is terrible? No one said they are awesome. Some idiot said they are terrible.TTJ said:I'm hearing Arizona is super awesome.
-
He seems to have some sand going on.RaceBannon said:
You really think a 10-2 team is terrible? No one said they are awesome. Some idiot said they are terrible.TTJ said:I'm hearing Arizona is super awesome.







