Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
More Religion of Peace
Comments
-
Lookit Mr. Pie Chart superiority guy here.OZONE said:
Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....PurpleJ said:People can back more than one candidate, you know.
Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...
And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.
It isn't going to add up to 100% if people were allowed to back more than one candidate in the poll. It would add up to 100% if the options were as follows: Mitt, Palin, Huck, or More than one candidate. But putting that on the chart wouldn't give the intended information, which was to show which candidate had a more backers.
They were showing the percentage of people polled that were in support of each candidate, and it's obvious they allowed them to pick more than one candidate.
HTH. OzoneFS. -
The problem is you don't appreciate abundance.OZONE said:
Stupid? You mean like the news sources that you wingers follow?RaceBannon said:
Your point is stupid, not missed. Hope this helpsOZONE said:God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.
I'm sure most of you won't understand the problem with this diagram...
honk em
-
PurpleJ said:
People can back more than one candidate, you know.
ROFL, ask anybody with a job. You don't convey that type of information on a pie chart, you do it on a bar chart. Pie charts are for reporting information where each section is a piece of the 100% whole. If Fox was trying to show what you suggest, they would have used a bar chart.PurpleJ said:
Lookit Mr. Pie Chart superiority guy here.OZONE said:
Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....PurpleJ said:People can back more than one candidate, you know.
Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...
And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.
It isn't going to add up to 100% if people were allowed to back more than one candidate in the poll. It would add up to 100% if the options were as follows: Mitt, Palin, Huck, or More than one candidate. But putting that on the chart wouldn't give the intended information, which was to show which candidate had a more backers.
They were showing the percentage of people polled that were in support of each candidate, and it's obvious they allowed them to pick more than one candidate.
HTH. OzoneFS. -
You really don't get it. There are no regulations or laws governing pie chart percentages. I guess they could have adjusted the percentages to add up to 100% (but that wouldn't have been very honest), or put it in a bar graph (which is the approved method of showing data with more than one response choice). If they wanted to be as clear as possible, they could have published the entire statistical study. But obviously they flashed that on screen for a few seconds, so that wasn't really necessary.OZONE said:PurpleJ said:People can back more than one candidate, you know.
ROFL, ask anybody with a job. You don't convey that type of information on a pie chart, you do it on a bar chart. Pie charts are for reporting information where each section is a piece of the 100% whole. If Fox was trying to show what you suggest, they would have used a bar chart.PurpleJ said:
Lookit Mr. Pie Chart superiority guy here.OZONE said:
Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....PurpleJ said:People can back more than one candidate, you know.
Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...
And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.
It isn't going to add up to 100% if people were allowed to back more than one candidate in the poll. It would add up to 100% if the options were as follows: Mitt, Palin, Huck, or More than one candidate. But putting that on the chart wouldn't give the intended information, which was to show which candidate had a more backers.
They were showing the percentage of people polled that were in support of each candidate, and it's obvious they allowed them to pick more than one candidate.
HTH. OzoneFS.
What does this have to do with you supporting the murder of women and children anyways? -
Ozone with the Rush and FAUX newz smack. Laying it down hard. Awesome.
Meanwhile we mocked his response to Muslim slime before he gave it and he thinks we don't get it because libruls are all smart and shit
Ozone you magnificent bastard we read your book. Your the most predictable poster here
*you're
lol
gfy -
Ozone is as annoying as that faggot Catard. Amazing the two cunts I hate on here most are ducks.
-
No one is missing the point except you.OZONE said:God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.
HTH. -
You say a lot of shit... most of it babbling nonsense that usually just sounds likeOZONE said:God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.
QUAAAACK, QUAAACK, QUACK, QUACK, QUACK... QUAAAACK, QUAAACK, QUACK, QUACK, QUACK... -
That at the time this poll was taken, 60%+ of respondents would have been happy with any of the three candidates.OZONE said:
Stupid? You mean like the news sources that you wingers follow?RaceBannon said:
Your point is stupid, not missed. Hope this helpsOZONE said:God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.
I'm sure most of you won't understand the problem with this diagram...
I win... if it's a Seaplane ride, I'll defer to Canard and you two can fly south for the winter.
-
The methodology of the poll might be legitimate, but whoever presented it for FoxNews should've been fired at the 50 yard line.OZONE said:
Stupid? You mean like the news sources that you wingers follow?RaceBannon said:
Your point is stupid, not missed. Hope this helpsOZONE said:God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.
I'm sure most of you won't understand the problem with this diagram...
A pie chart shouldn't be used when dealing with a sum of over 100% (bar plot would be ideal), the pie chart is just in basic thirds and weren't changed to reflect actual values, and the text look like it was made in mspaint. Fuck, look at the source that was split in two lines.
If this weren't FoxNews, I'd say that someone made this on the internet to make FoxNews look bad, but I wouldn't be surprised if this were actually broadcasted.
