Reviewing the losses of 2013 and 2014

Comments

• Options

  MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

  

  November 2014

  Neat comparison.
  
  But I have to ask, so what?

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123

  

  

  November 2014

  MisterEm said:

  Neat comparison.
  
  But I have to ask, so what?

  So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  Postal91 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,731

  

  

  November 2014

  Soooooo, CP is going to hit up Tuscon Joey's the night before with the coaching staff and we are going to get curb-stomped? Oh boy, cannot wait for this one.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,460

  

  November 2014

  RoadDawg55 said:

  MisterEm said:

  Neat comparison.
  
  But I have to ask, so what?

  So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

  Or that Petersen is doing better than Sark.
  
  Think about it, this is Petersen's trasition year and it's still arguably better than Sark's best year. Sark had 4 years to implement his system and had an offense with Keith Price, Bishop Sankey, Kevin Smith, ASJ and Ben Riva. Petersen has had 0 years and his offense consists of no one, not to mention everyone learning a new playbook (one that sucks) and new blocking scheme (no more zone blocking).

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123

  

  

  November 2014 edited November 2014

  whatshouldicareabout said:

  RoadDawg55 said:

  MisterEm said:

  Neat comparison.
  
  But I have to ask, so what?

  So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

  Or that Petersen is doing better than Sark.
  
  Think about it, this is Petersen's trasition year and it's still arguably better than Sark's best year. Sark had 4 years to implement his system and had an offense with Keith Price, Bishop Sankey, Kevin Smith, ASJ and Ben Riva. Petersen has had 0 years and his offense consists of no one, not to mention everyone learning a new playbook (one that sucks) and new blocking scheme (no more zone blocking).

  Enough with the fucking excuses for Petersen. Either he will win or he won't. Right now, he sucks. Sark also sucked. One more loss is 4-5. Two more losses and he's done worse than Sark in his worst year.
  
  Did you make posts that showed how Sark was better than Ty? Hopefully in future years Petersen gets it going.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295

  

  November 2014

  whatshouldicareabout said:

  RoadDawg55 said:

  MisterEm said:

  Neat comparison.
  
  But I have to ask, so what?

  So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

  Or that Petersen is doing better than Sark.
  
  Think about it, this is Petersen's trasition year and it's still arguably better than Sark's best year. Sark had 4 years to implement his system and had an offense with Keith Price, Bishop Sankey, Kevin Smith, ASJ and Ben Riva. Petersen has had 0 years and his offense consists of no one, not to mention everyone learning a new playbook (one that sucks) and new blocking scheme (no more zone blocking).

  Next year is the transition year for Petersen, not this year.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter