Reviewing the losses of 2013 and 2014

whatshouldicareabout

2013
at Stanford 31-28
Oregon 45-24
at ASU 53-24
at UCLA 41-31

2014
Stanford 20-13
at Oregon 45-20
ASU 24-10
UCLA 44-30

Things to note are that this year's Stanford is a shell of last year's Stanford, ASU and UCLA look to be better teams, and Oregon is about the same.

The scores look comparable, with ASU being the only real change since it was 10-10 in 4Q this year instead of 46-17 like last year.

MisterEm

Neat comparison.

But I have to ask, so what?

RoadDawg55

MisterEm said:

Neat comparison.

But I have to ask, so what?

So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

Postal91

Soooooo, CP is going to hit up Tuscon Joey's the night before with the coaching staff and we are going to get curb-stomped? Oh boy, cannot wait for this one.

whatshouldicareabout

RoadDawg55 said:

MisterEm said:

Neat comparison.

But I have to ask, so what?

So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

Or that Petersen is doing better than Sark.

Think about it, this is Petersen's trasition year and it's still arguably better than Sark's best year. Sark had 4 years to implement his system and had an offense with Keith Price, Bishop Sankey, Kevin Smith, ASJ and Ben Riva. Petersen has had 0 years and his offense consists of no one, not to mention everyone learning a new playbook (one that sucks) and new blocking scheme (no more zone blocking).

RoadDawg55

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:

MisterEm said:

Neat comparison.

But I have to ask, so what?

So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

Or that Petersen is doing better than Sark.

Think about it, this is Petersen's trasition year and it's still arguably better than Sark's best year. Sark had 4 years to implement his system and had an offense with Keith Price, Bishop Sankey, Kevin Smith, ASJ and Ben Riva. Petersen has had 0 years and his offense consists of no one, not to mention everyone learning a new playbook (one that sucks) and new blocking scheme (no more zone blocking).

Enough with the fucking excuses for Petersen. Either he will win or he won't. Right now, he sucks. Sark also sucked. One more loss is 4-5. Two more losses and he's done worse than Sark in his worst year.

Did you make posts that showed how Sark was better than Ty? Hopefully in future years Petersen gets it going.

HeretoBeatmyChest

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:

MisterEm said:

Neat comparison.

But I have to ask, so what?

So we can see that Petersen is doing as well as Sark. Who gives a fuck? Neither is good enough.

Or that Petersen is doing better than Sark.

Think about it, this is Petersen's trasition year and it's still arguably better than Sark's best year. Sark had 4 years to implement his system and had an offense with Keith Price, Bishop Sankey, Kevin Smith, ASJ and Ben Riva. Petersen has had 0 years and his offense consists of no one, not to mention everyone learning a new playbook (one that sucks) and new blocking scheme (no more zone blocking).

Next year is the transition year for Petersen, not this year.