Direct from the spin machine
Comments
-
Sounds like Fleenor.AZDuck said:I was just talking to a Mizzou fan today who thinks that: (1) Mizzou is going win ten games this year, and (2) Washington will be much improved and will push Oregon and maybe even beat us.
/dismissivewankingmotion
-
i'll get roasted here, but there is evidence that pinkel is one of the better coaches in the country
-
Pinkel's first six years at Missouri:HeretoBeatmyChest said:If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?
After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.
Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach and I wouldn't hire him now but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.
2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North)
Name one REAL football school in America that would have kept him after year 4, much less year 6.
He's done some nice things there, but he is only 49-48 career at Missouri in conference play. Sark's conference record is better than that. -
Yet despite being so average unlike Sark still managed to win more than 7 games a few times in his career.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Pinkel's first six years at Missouri:HeretoBeatmyChest said:If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?
After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.
Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach and I wouldn't hire him now but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.
2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North)
Name one REAL football school in America that would have kept him after year 4, much less year 6.
He's done some nice things there, but he is only 49-48 career at Missouri in conference play. Sark's conference record is better than that.
Sark is a worse version of stellar coaches like Pinkel, Gailey, Neuheisel, and Tedford. -
Pinkel in the 2 hole for a big surprise in 2013???
-
Is it Fleenor who is the big fan of Gary Pinkell?
-
Is it the 0 conference championships in 12 years at Missouri?greenearplugs said:i'll get roasted here, but there is evidence that pinkel is one of the better coaches in the country
Or perhaps it's the two Big 12 championship game appearences that he lost by a combined 62 points? -
I'm not sure about that, but they did share some pops at Butler Cabin quite a few times.He_Needs_More_Time said:Is it Fleenor who is the big fan of Gary Pinkell?
-
Agree.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Throw in Don James too who was a former QB who became a defensive minded coach.RoadDawg55 said:
Harbaugh, Chip, Urban Meyer, Chris Petersen... Curious why you would say that?vadawg said:Never hire an offensively minded coach....never. Look at the statistics.
But to VaDawg's point, I think after the last four coaches we've had, its time to bring on a defensive minded HC.
If he continues his upward trend a hot name is going to be Bob Diaco.
Just don't listen to his dating advice.
-
Win a BCS bowl and you don't deserve to be in that list.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yet despite being so average unlike Sark still managed to win more than 7 games a few times in his career.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Pinkel's first six years at Missouri:HeretoBeatmyChest said:If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?
After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.
Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach and I wouldn't hire him now but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.
2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North)
Name one REAL football school in America that would have kept him after year 4, much less year 6.
He's done some nice things there, but he is only 49-48 career at Missouri in conference play. Sark's conference record is better than that.
Sark is a worse version of stellar coaches like Pinkel, Gailey, Neuheisel, and Tedford.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
