Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

There's really no downside re: Peters Dismissal

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Gladstone said:

    Gladstone said:

    UCLA and arguably Arizona are good teams broski

    No.

    Just no.
    When you're done rooting Mike Slive's cock, please explain how a 7-2 team with losses to #3 and #17, and with a blowout road 62-27 victory @ #9 doesn't qualify as 'good'

    If your argument centers on narrow victories over dreckfest teams, don't bother as you've already lost.
    The fact that ASU is #9 in the country just shows that that there are a maximum of eight good teams in the country. I'd call it seven, as I think MSU isn't good either.
    I lied, there are nine good teams in the country. The CFP committee has two of them too low.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Gladstone said:

    doogville said:

    This is some high level dooging.

    These games do matter. Some of us would like to reach the very attainable 10 wins. And kick UCLA's teeth in.

    By your logic, we should sit our entire d line (all seniors) and get reps for the young kids. But wait, that would be stupid because winning is fun and is supposed to matter.

    It sucks to lose Peters. It is what it is, but this "this is a best case scenario" shit is ridiculous.

    Hmm. I agree. It would be a huge statement if Petersen won more games in his debut season (10) than SarkFS did in any of his seasons. Momentum going into the offseason for recruiting would be huge as well. We also have some unfinished business with UCLA and Mora, time to fucking win and beat a good team.
    Sark left after 8 ... Tui won game #9 ...
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Gladstone said:

    Gladstone said:

    UCLA and arguably Arizona are good teams broski

    No.

    Just no.
    When you're done rooting Mike Slive's cock, please explain how a 7-2 team with losses to #3 and #17, and with a blowout road 62-27 victory @ #9 doesn't qualify as 'good'

    If your argument centers on narrow victories over dreckfest teams, don't bother as you've already lost.
    Maybe your eyes aren't as good as mine ... but mine show UCLA to be a sloppy team that has some significant problems on the OL. They tend to be a team that if they get hit in the mouth they tend to retreat a little bit and don't respond well to adversity. If you can take away the run game from Hundley (not the run game in general, but HIS run game), it really hurts their offense.

    There's no question that they are insanely talented. However, with the exception of the ASU game this year (and really about an 8 to 10 minute stretch of that game), can you name for me any game where they looked impressive? The next closest would be what they did to Arizona ... but that depends on what your opinion of Arizona is.
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298

    He seems a lot like Ty. I'm not saying he he Ty. So don't twist. He's running off the best players and doing dumb fake punts and shit.

    How many BCS bowl wins did Ty have?