There's really no downside re: Peters Dismissal
Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.
Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.
Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.
The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.
Comments
-
He seems a lot like Ty. I'm not saying he he Ty. So don't twist. He's running off the best players and doing dumb fake punts and shit.
-
But how's his golf game?MikeDamone said:He seems a lot like Ty. I'm not saying he he Ty. So don't twist. He's running off the best players and doing dumb fake punts and shit.
-
What is with the racist crap?
-
We could win out and Petersen would tie Ty (TyTy? I don't like to call him that) in total wins at UW. I'm not saying that will happen, but it could. Either way it'll be interesting. Unless it's not.MikeDamone said:He seems a lot like Ty. I'm not saying he he Ty. So don't twist. He's running off the best players and doing dumb fake punts and shit.
-
I like to call him Ty the same way I like to call DJ DJ. It saves a lot of time. I like saving time. That's what I like to do.BrothaString said:
We could win out and Petersen would tie Ty (TyTy? I don't like to call him that) in total wins at UW. I'm not saying that will happen, but it could. Either way it'll be interesting. Unless it's not.MikeDamone said:He seems a lot like Ty. I'm not saying he he Ty. So don't twist. He's running off the best players and doing dumb fake punts and shit.
-
This is some high level dooging.
These games do matter. Some of us would like to reach the very attainable 10 wins. And kick UCLA's teeth in.
By your logic, we should sit our entire d line (all seniors) and get reps for the young kids. But wait, that would be stupid because winning is fun and is supposed to matter.
It sucks to lose Peters. It is what it is, but this "this is a best case scenario" shit is ridiculous. -
Doogman is more your speed.doogville said:This is some high level dooging.
These games do matter. Some of us would like to reach the very attainable 10 wins. And kick UCLA's teeth in.
By your logic, we should sit our entire d line (all seniors) and get reps for the young kids. But wait, that would be stupid because winning is fun and is supposed to matter.
It sucks to lose Peters. It is what it is, but this "this is a best case scenario" shit is ridiculous.
-
I would reaping but (Hi Beezelfag!)doogville said:This is some high level dooging.
These games do matter. Some of us would like to reach the very attainable 10 wins. And kick UCLA's teeth in.
By your logic, we should sit our entire d line (all seniors) and get reps for the young kids. But wait, that would be stupid because winning is fun and is supposed to matter.
It sucks to lose Peters. It is what it is, but this "this is a best case scenario" shit is ridiculous.
LEAVE!!!
-
Everyone wants to win. This is a long-term decision. He needs to set a precedent and show the younger guys the nonsense and insubordination won't be tolerated.doogville said:This is some high level dooging.
These games do matter. Some of us would like to reach the very attainable 10 wins. And kick UCLA's teeth in.
By your logic, we should sit our entire d line (all seniors) and get reps for the young kids. But wait, that would be stupid because winning is fun and is supposed to matter.
It sucks to lose Peters. It is what it is, but this "this is a best case scenario" shit is ridiculous.
In two or three years noone will care if we were 9-5 or 10-4 and whether it was the Purple Vegas Bowl, boner Sun Bowel, Alamo Bowl or the toilet bowl. If it's not a Rose Bowl or really high second tier bowl like the Cotton (which has no tie-in) noone GAF anyway. -
Congratulations for winning most convoluted logic award on this board, thats quite a featBrothaString said:For all intensive purposes, TSIO.
Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.
Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.
Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.
The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.
