A college football proposal between the SEC and PAC
Comments
-
-
If you take a second, look down at your penis. If you have a foreskin, peel it back, if not, just look.
You will notice that the head of the penis is slightly larger than the shaft, at the lower end of the shaft there is a sort of flanged area, followed by the drill head penis tip.
Nature by design made the male penis like this. Back in the day, lives and survival were at stake, women needed desperately to reproduce for the survival of the species, women would have many sexual partners, there were no condoms and so many men were all having sex and shooting loads into the female's vagina at the same time.
Now take a look back at your penis (it's got a slight chub from my sex talk, right? Don't worry, n-no homo and move on) well now you're looking at your penis you will notice that it is somewhat shaped like perhaps a plunger? You see? Penises were designed to plunge deep into a woman's vagina and plunge the other's man's semen out (pulling the semen out with the flanged base of the head) and then eventually, impregnating the woman with their own seed. This theoretically accounts for our obsession with penis size, a larger penis could penetrate and shoot seed deeper and further than other men's penises could reach, thus ensuring impregnation.
You see, back then, survival was hard and resources were limited. Men were hunter-gatherers and killing a Saber-toothed tiger is hard as chit and collecting berries is boring as phuck. So these cavemen wanted to ensure that the children they were providing for, were their own, thus ensuring the successful passing on of their genes and the survival of their legacy.
The more you know. -
Or how about a Pac-12 team tries to win a National Championship?
-
Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
-
It's time for @Dardanus to have his own column.Dardanus said:If you take a second, look down at your penis. If you have a foreskin, peel it back, if not, just look.
You will notice that the head of the penis is slightly larger than the shaft, at the lower end of the shaft there is a sort of flanged area, followed by the drill head penis tip.
Nature by design made the male penis like this. Back in the day, lives and survival were at stake, women needed desperately to reproduce for the survival of the species, women would have many sexual partners, there were no condoms and so many men were all having sex and shooting loads into the female's vagina at the same time.
Now take a look back at your penis (it's got a slight chub from my sex talk, right? Don't worry, n-no homo and move on) well now you're looking at your penis you will notice that it is somewhat shaped like perhaps a plunger? You see? Penises were designed to plunge deep into a woman's vagina and plunge the other's man's semen out (pulling the semen out with the flanged base of the head) and then eventually, impregnating the woman with their own seed. This theoretically accounts for our obsession with penis size, a larger penis could penetrate and shoot seed deeper and further than other men's penises could reach, thus ensuring impregnation.
You see, back then, survival was hard and resources were limited. Men were hunter-gatherers and killing a Saber-toothed tiger is hard as chit and collecting berries is boring as phuck. So these cavemen wanted to ensure that the children they were providing for, were their own, thus ensuring the successful passing on of their genes and the survival of their legacy.
The more you know. -
Can you PM a pic to those of us who are F3 fat and haven't had the capability to see our own penis for decades?Dardanus said:If you take a second, look down at your penis. If you have a foreskin, peel it back, if not, just look.
You will notice that the head of the penis is slightly larger than the shaft, at the lower end of the shaft there is a sort of flanged area, followed by the drill head penis tip.
Nature by design made the male penis like this. Back in the day, lives and survival were at stake, women needed desperately to reproduce for the survival of the species, women would have many sexual partners, there were no condoms and so many men were all having sex and shooting loads into the female's vagina at the same time.
Now take a look back at your penis (it's got a slight chub from my sex talk, right? Don't worry, n-no homo and move on) well now you're looking at your penis you will notice that it is somewhat shaped like perhaps a plunger? You see? Penises were designed to plunge deep into a woman's vagina and plunge the other's man's semen out (pulling the semen out with the flanged base of the head) and then eventually, impregnating the woman with their own seed. This theoretically accounts for our obsession with penis size, a larger penis could penetrate and shoot seed deeper and further than other men's penises could reach, thus ensuring impregnation.
You see, back then, survival was hard and resources were limited. Men were hunter-gatherers and killing a Saber-toothed tiger is hard as chit and collecting berries is boring as phuck. So these cavemen wanted to ensure that the children they were providing for, were their own, thus ensuring the successful passing on of their genes and the survival of their legacy.
The more you know.
Multiple pictures if you have them...
-
A Modest Proposal > A college football proposal between the SEC and PAC
-
An Indecent Proposal>A Modest Proposal > A college football proposal between the SEC and PACdnc said:A Modest Proposal > A college football proposal between the SEC and PAC
-
We don't want Bama.oregonblitzkrieg said:Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
The season would be over sooner than usual.
-
You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams. I preferred getting our teeth knocked in by LSU than beating Fresno State.PurpleJ said:
We don't want Bama.oregonblitzkrieg said:Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
The season would be over sooner than usual. -
Completely agree, but it's not happpeningoregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams.PurpleJ said:
We don't want Bama.oregonblitzkrieg said:Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
The season would be over sooner than usual.
-
-
Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.
-
The Yucks (lol) spent decades getting their teeth kicked in. And they did so in front of 30000 fans. I don't think other Oregon fans really agree with you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams. I preferred getting our teeth knocked in by LSU than beating Fresno State.PurpleJ said:
We don't want Bama.oregonblitzkrieg said:Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
The season would be over sooner than usual.
-
One would think you of all people would appreciate any thought that is at least a paragraph long.Tequilla said:Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.
-
Pressingoregonblitzkrieg said:
One would think you of all people would appreciate any thought that is at least a paragraph long.Tequilla said:Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.
-
YBETequilla said:
Pressingoregonblitzkrieg said:
One would think you of all people would appreciate any thought that is at least a paragraph long.Tequilla said:Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.
-
You're a dipshit.oregonblitzkrieg said:Each year one random team from the SEC and one random team from the Pacific conference of champions switch places. The SEC team will play the PAC team's away and home schedule, and vice versa. The SEC and PAC teams in question will play their home games in their own stadium. This will give every PAC team the chance to eventually play every SEC team, with the added bonus that most PAC teams will have to face at least one SEC team per year. Sounds fun to me.
-
obligatory fixAlexis said:
The Yucks (lol) spent duckades getting their teeth kicked in. And they did so in front of 30000 fans. I don't think other Oregon fans really agree with you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams. I preferred getting our teeth knocked in by LSU than beating Fresno State.PurpleJ said:
We don't want Bama.oregonblitzkrieg said:Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
The season would be over sooner than usual. -
Someone is stuck in 2011.PurpleJ said:
We don't want Bama.oregonblitzkrieg said:Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
The season would be over sooner than usual.










