Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A college football proposal between the SEC and PAC

oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
edited November 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
Each year one random team from the SEC and one random team from the Pacific conference of champions switch places. The SEC team will play the PAC team's away and home schedule, and vice versa. The SEC and PAC teams in question will play their home games in their own stadium. This will give every PAC team the chance to eventually play every SEC team, with the added bonus that most PAC teams will have to face at least one SEC team per year. Sounds fun to me.

Comments

  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 36,787
    Or how about a Pac-12 team tries to win a National Championship?
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Dardanus said:

    If you take a second, look down at your penis. If you have a foreskin, peel it back, if not, just look.
    You will notice that the head of the penis is slightly larger than the shaft, at the lower end of the shaft there is a sort of flanged area, followed by the drill head penis tip.
    Nature by design made the male penis like this. Back in the day, lives and survival were at stake, women needed desperately to reproduce for the survival of the species, women would have many sexual partners, there were no condoms and so many men were all having sex and shooting loads into the female's vagina at the same time.
    Now take a look back at your penis (it's got a slight chub from my sex talk, right? Don't worry, n-no homo and move on) well now you're looking at your penis you will notice that it is somewhat shaped like perhaps a plunger? You see? Penises were designed to plunge deep into a woman's vagina and plunge the other's man's semen out (pulling the semen out with the flanged base of the head) and then eventually, impregnating the woman with their own seed. This theoretically accounts for our obsession with penis size, a larger penis could penetrate and shoot seed deeper and further than other men's penises could reach, thus ensuring impregnation.
    You see, back then, survival was hard and resources were limited. Men were hunter-gatherers and killing a Saber-toothed tiger is hard as chit and collecting berries is boring as phuck. So these cavemen wanted to ensure that the children they were providing for, were their own, thus ensuring the successful passing on of their genes and the survival of their legacy.
    The more you know.

    It's time for @Dardanus‌ to have his own column.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    A Modest Proposal > A college football proposal between the SEC and PAC
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    dnc said:

    A Modest Proposal > A college football proposal between the SEC and PAC

    An Indecent Proposal>A Modest Proposal > A college football proposal between the SEC and PAC
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 36,787

    Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.

    We don't want Bama.

    The season would be over sooner than usual.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2014
    PurpleJ said:

    Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.

    We don't want Bama.

    The season would be over sooner than usual.
    You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams. I preferred getting our teeth knocked in by LSU than beating Fresno State.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614

    PurpleJ said:

    Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.

    We don't want Bama.

    The season would be over sooner than usual.
    You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams.
    Completely agree, but it's not happpening

  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,823
    Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.
  • AlexisAlexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,086 Swaye's Wigwam

    PurpleJ said:

    Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.

    We don't want Bama.

    The season would be over sooner than usual.
    You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams. I preferred getting our teeth knocked in by LSU than beating Fresno State.
    The Yucks (lol) spent decades getting their teeth kicked in. And they did so in front of 30000 fans. I don't think other Oregon fans really agree with you.

  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Tequilla said:

    Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.

    One would think you of all people would appreciate any thought that is at least a paragraph long.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,823

    Tequilla said:

    Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.

    One would think you of all people would appreciate any thought that is at least a paragraph long.
    Pressing
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Sometimes I think you can't say anything even dumber than the last thing you said ... and then you go out and totally prove to me that having such a thought is EktardFS.

    One would think you of all people would appreciate any thought that is at least a paragraph long.
    Pressing
    YBE
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504

    Each year one random team from the SEC and one random team from the Pacific conference of champions switch places. The SEC team will play the PAC team's away and home schedule, and vice versa. The SEC and PAC teams in question will play their home games in their own stadium. This will give every PAC team the chance to eventually play every SEC team, with the added bonus that most PAC teams will have to face at least one SEC team per year. Sounds fun to me.

    You're a dipshit.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    Alexis said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.

    We don't want Bama.

    The season would be over sooner than usual.
    You don't improve by playing opponents like Eastern Washington and Hawaii. Getting your teeth knocked in by better competition > playing mediocre teams. I preferred getting our teeth knocked in by LSU than beating Fresno State.
    The Yucks (lol) spent duckades getting their teeth kicked in. And they did so in front of 30000 fans. I don't think other Oregon fans really agree with you.

    obligatory fix
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,491 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    Anyone who tries to deny that they wouldn't love to have at least one SEC opponent per year is lying.

    We don't want Bama.

    The season would be over sooner than usual.
    Someone is stuck in 2011.
Sign In or Register to comment.