Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Talking Husky Football with Kyle Benn

Hardcore_Husky
Hardcore_Husky Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 309 Swaye's Wigwam
edited November 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
imageTalking Husky Football with Kyle Benn

The former captain and Rose Bowl Champion gives his thoughts on Jonathan Smith, the offensive line, and the direction of the program.

Read the full story here


· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Good chit and first, bitches
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    But how is Kyle Benn doing in the Pick 'Em?

    I agree that something this program seems to lack is role models.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicUdubDawg
    AtomicUdubDawg Member Posts: 4
    Senior year & players with no work ethic, coach ricky's watch was club med
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,927
    "you lost the best tight end in the nation"

    disagree.

    GRAA, though. Seriously.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    he talks as if 9 or 10 wins is not possible. The game against UCLA will be huge and is a gateway to that goal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited November 2014
    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    It was you, Canard, that stated these players were overrated in response to Benn's assessment - Not I. I disputed your quook analysis with facts supported by the draft.

    Let's take the conjecture and paraphrasing out of the scenario since you are neglecting the limp-wrist who coached the two in question.

    Who were the first RB's selected last year by the NFL?

    Who were the first TE's selected by the NFL?

    What team did these two play for previously?

    Is the NFL draft overrated, Canard?

    Or was Sark's utilization of said 'overrated' players the question?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter