Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Talking Husky Football with Kyle Benn

Hardcore_HuskyHardcore_Husky Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 304 Swaye's Wigwam
edited November 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
imageTalking Husky Football with Kyle Benn

The former captain and Rose Bowl Champion gives his thoughts on Jonathan Smith, the offensive line, and the direction of the program.

Read the full story here


· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Good chit and first, bitches
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,193
    But how is Kyle Benn doing in the Pick 'Em?

    I agree that something this program seems to lack is role models.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicUdubDawgAtomicUdubDawg Member Posts: 4
    Senior year & players with no work ethic, coach ricky's watch was club med
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,895 Swaye's Wigwam
    "you lost the best tight end in the nation"

    disagree.

    GRAA, though. Seriously.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    he talks as if 9 or 10 wins is not possible. The game against UCLA will be huge and is a gateway to that goal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited November 2014
    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    It was you, Canard, that stated these players were overrated in response to Benn's assessment - Not I. I disputed your quook analysis with facts supported by the draft.

    Let's take the conjecture and paraphrasing out of the scenario since you are neglecting the limp-wrist who coached the two in question.

    Who were the first RB's selected last year by the NFL?

    Who were the first TE's selected by the NFL?

    What team did these two play for previously?

    Is the NFL draft overrated, Canard?

    Or was Sark's utilization of said 'overrated' players the question?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    It was you, Canard, that stated these players were overrated in response to Benn's assessment - Not I. I disputed your quook analysis with facts supported by the draft.

    Let's take the conjecture and paraphrasing out of the scenario since you are neglecting the limp-wrist who coached the two in question.

    Who were the first RB's selected last year by the NFL?

    Who were the first TE's selected by the NFL?

    What team did these two play for previously?

    Is the NFL draft overrated, Canard?

    Or was Sark's utilization of said 'overrated' players the question?
    Jack Lockner was a top ten draft pick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    It was you, Canard, that stated these players were overrated in response to Benn's assessment - Not I. I disputed your quook analysis with facts supported by the draft.

    Let's take the conjecture and paraphrasing out of the scenario since you are neglecting the limp-wrist who coached the two in question.

    Who were the first RB's selected last year by the NFL?

    Who were the first TE's selected by the NFL?

    What team did these two play for previously?

    Is the NFL draft overrated, Canard?

    Or was Sark's utilization of said 'overrated' players the question?
    Ho Lee Fyuk.

    The NFL misses all of the time. The Mike Fucking James was a second round pick. Dion Jordan was a first rounder. They've done fuck-all in the NFL, but in college they accomplished a shit ton more than Sankey and ASJ ever did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited November 2014
    90sHuskyFan said:

    "You've got some jackasses already calling for Petersen's head."

    Hi Kim!

    And his dick suckers Johnb and Huskyclaus. Fuck those guys.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Benn does not act like 0-12 never happened.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,236 Standard Supporter
    Ho Lee Fyuk, are you intoxicated from drinking Cum of Sum Yung Gai?

    Hau'oli has more sacks this year after 9 games than Dion Jordan had in his entire career. Jordan was a product of Oregon's hype machine and some 'roiding that wasn't caught for awhile.
    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    It was you, Canard, that stated these players were overrated in response to Benn's assessment - Not I. I disputed your quook analysis with facts supported by the draft.

    Let's take the conjecture and paraphrasing out of the scenario since you are neglecting the limp-wrist who coached the two in question.

    Who were the first RB's selected last year by the NFL?

    Who were the first TE's selected by the NFL?

    What team did these two play for previously?

    Is the NFL draft overrated, Canard?

    Or was Sark's utilization of said 'overrated' players the question?
    Ho Lee Fyuk.

    The NFL misses all of the time. The Mike Fucking James was a second round pick. Dion Jordan was a first rounder. They've done fuck-all in the NFL, but in college they accomplished a shit ton more than Sankey and ASJ ever did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    Lotta hot sack talk up in here
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    MisterEm said:

    Canard said:

    ". . .you lost one of the most statistically significant quarterbacks we've had, you lost the best running back in the nation, you lost the best tight end in the nation, you had an injury to what could have been one of the best wide receivers in the nation, and lost a couple great o-linemen."

    The constant overrating of the UW talent base from all manner of observers has been one of the wellsprings of bitterness in the fanbase during the "lost decade."

    Were these guys who are name dropped talented individuals? No doubt. Were they "best in the nation" talents? Lulz.

    The NFL draft disagrees with Canard's talent evaluation concerning the RB and TE.

    QPOTD nominee.

    RIF. Benn's ass kissing doesn't say the two were AMONG the best in the nation. He said they were THE best in the nation. The first notion would be sensible. They way he actually put it is horseshit. The "best in the nation" don't repeatedly disappear in big games.
    It was you, Canard, that stated these players were overrated in response to Benn's assessment - Not I. I disputed your quook analysis with facts supported by the draft.

    Let's take the conjecture and paraphrasing out of the scenario since you are neglecting the limp-wrist who coached the two in question.

    Who were the first RB's selected last year by the NFL?

    Who were the first TE's selected by the NFL?

    What team did these two play for previously?

    Is the NFL draft overrated, Canard?

    Or was Sark's utilization of said 'overrated' players the question?
    Ho Lee Fyuk.

    The NFL misses all of the time. The Mike Fucking James was a second round pick. Dion Jordan was a first rounder. They've done fuck-all in the NFL, but in college they accomplished a shit ton more than Sankey and ASJ ever did.
    Christ, you are dense.

    It was you Canard, who said the players were overrated and went on the diatribe. Not I. I don't need to defend myself. I will leave the player rating to the professionals in the NFL.

    No mention of the drunk lazy coach calling the shots.

    No mention of your elite scouting talent over the years. Just quook logic.

    You still seem alone on that cliff.


    Cliffnotes:

    1. Canard's eyes > NFL scouts

    2. Overrated in CFB = Drafted first at their position.

    Capich, HH?






















    * It is Friday somewhere!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.