Coaching Effect over the last 7 years
Comments
-
low tweak
-
He's right. You only get one shot.HillsboroDuck said:
disagree. Once you do the second it cancels out the first. Abundance lacking.AZDuck said:Hey, I just noticed you can flag AND down vote a comment. Abundance.
-
Dammit... I was so excited about that. Well... I think this coaching effect thing has merit. Nice post from op
-
As I have always said: A 4 win coach + 10 win players = 7-6HillsboroDuck said:Sark has been lucky to go 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6. He's closer to a 4-9 coach than 9-4
We're fucked. -
Do we have 11 or 12 win players now and will get to 8-5 or 9-4? Or might the negative coaching effect be exacerbated by the presence of more depth and talent? As in 6 or 5 wins. Anything less than 9 regular season wins this year is unacceptable.
-
Nice post.greenearplugs said:Good article on measuring the coaching effect over the last 7 years:
http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2013/8/19/4635732/college-football-apparent-talent-coaching-effects
To sum it up, the guy normalized talent rankings and then compared to wins. then ranked about 130 coaches spanning 7 seasons. He doesn't aggregate by coach, but i copied his numbers into excel and did it on my own. Turns out of the 130 coaches, steve sarksian is the 109th ranked coach out of 132 measured. believe it or not, Willingham is ranked 105. Fuck. So who is the better coach, Sarksian or Willingham? I thought it was pretty clear that Sark was better. Now i'm not so sure.
For the record here are the TOP ranked coaches of the last 7 years:
1) Sumlin
2) Saban
3) C. Kelly
4) Jagodzinski
5) T. Bowden
6) Bielema
7) Shaw
8) B. Kelly
9) B. Jones
10) Beamer
11) Gundy
12) Leavitt
13) Petrino
14) B. Stoops
15) Bellotti
16) Tressel
17) Dantonio
18) Patterson
19) Mangino
20) Pinkel
21) Riley
Anybody in the Top 100 available next year?
Incremental Progress.
-
Top 100? We are fucking Washington. I want a top 15......Bellotti!!!!tracker said:
Nice post.greenearplugs said:Good article on measuring the coaching effect over the last 7 years:
http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2013/8/19/4635732/college-football-apparent-talent-coaching-effects
To sum it up, the guy normalized talent rankings and then compared to wins. then ranked about 130 coaches spanning 7 seasons. He doesn't aggregate by coach, but i copied his numbers into excel and did it on my own. Turns out of the 130 coaches, steve sarksian is the 109th ranked coach out of 132 measured. believe it or not, Willingham is ranked 105. Fuck. So who is the better coach, Sarksian or Willingham? I thought it was pretty clear that Sark was better. Now i'm not so sure.
For the record here are the TOP ranked coaches of the last 7 years:
1) Sumlin
2) Saban
3) C. Kelly
4) Jagodzinski
5) T. Bowden
6) Bielema
7) Shaw
8) B. Kelly
9) B. Jones
10) Beamer
11) Gundy
12) Leavitt
13) Petrino
14) B. Stoops
15) Bellotti
16) Tressel
17) Dantonio
18) Patterson
19) Mangino
20) Pinkel
21) Riley
Anybody in the Top 100 available next year?
Incremental Progress. -
Who needs a coach in the top 100 when you have so much fucking house money!
That list is fucking depressing btw. Hope Woodward drinks some gasoline and swallows a match. Today. -
Thanks for that comment. I haven't had a belly roar in quite a while.Swaye said:Who needs a coach in the top 100 when you have so much fucking house money!
That list is fucking depressing btw. Hope Woodward drinks some gasoline and swallows a match. Today.
-
You're in the media room, I take it?Homebrew_Dawg said:
Thanks for that comment. I haven't had a belly roar in quite a while.Swaye said:Who needs a coach in the top 100 when you have so much fucking house money!
That list is fucking depressing btw. Hope Woodward drinks some gasoline and swallows a match. Today.
