Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Grinolds says that it will take three years...

2

Comments

  • KenND
    KenND Member Posts: 272

    KenND said:

    ...for Petersen to get UW to the point that they can compete with Oregon. Agree or disagree?

    Interestingly enough, no theories from him on why the roster is in the shape that it's in.

    Remind me again when Sark was competitive against Oregon.



    No one said that he was.
  • PDXDuckFan
    PDXDuckFan Member Posts: 450
    KenND said:



    It is bold, but you have an adult in charge now, while Oregon could potentially start dropping off. It also looks like we're seeing Stanford's decline starting to gain steam too.

    "We're Back"*











    *maybe in 3 years

  • PDXDuckFan
    PDXDuckFan Member Posts: 450



    2016 is Pete's year 3 and we know that with a new coach it happens by year 3.

    2016 is going to be special.

  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,576
    Grinolds posted this in response to someone else posting a talk they had with a former UW player who essentially said that it would take CP 3 years to build the program due to the shitty way Sark ran it. The way Grinolds stated "If I would have told all of you it would be another 3 years, how many of you would have gone crazy?", he was insinuating that if Sark had stayed, UW would be a national title contender this year, but since everyone wanted him gone, you all are stuck with rebuilding again.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,358
    Sark was not the answer. Petersen might be. Either way tilt be interesting.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031

    Grinolds posted this in response to someone else posting a talk they had with a former UW player who essentially said that it would take CP 3 years to build the program due to the shitty way Sark ran it. The way Grinolds stated "If I would have told all of you it would be another 3 years, how many of you would have gone crazy?", he was insinuating that if Sark had stayed, UW would be a national title contender this year, but since everyone wanted him gone, you all are stuck with rebuilding again.

    let's just put this way, if Sark is at USC in another 3 years I'll be stunned... no way in hell he has UW in contention for a Pac12 championship regardless of how much tim he had here.
  • Vegasdawg
    Vegasdawg Member Posts: 370
    It could take three years to have a full roster of those who have been coached up under Peterman's system and recruited to fit the program. We definitely need to sign more speed.
  • KenND
    KenND Member Posts: 272
    Meek said:

    Grinolds posted this in response to someone else posting a talk they had with a former UW player who essentially said that it would take CP 3 years to build the program due to the shitty way Sark ran it. The way Grinolds stated "If I would have told all of you it would be another 3 years, how many of you would have gone crazy?", he was insinuating that if Sark had stayed, UW would be a national title contender this year, but since everyone wanted him gone, you all are stuck with rebuilding again.

    let's just put this way, if Sark is at USC in another 3 years I'll be stunned... no way in hell he has UW in contention for a Pac12 championship regardless of how much tim he had here.
    Sark is going to win enough that it will be difficult for Haden to justify firing him, especially since Sark is Haden's hire.
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    KenND said:

    Meek said:

    Grinolds posted this in response to someone else posting a talk they had with a former UW player who essentially said that it would take CP 3 years to build the program due to the shitty way Sark ran it. The way Grinolds stated "If I would have told all of you it would be another 3 years, how many of you would have gone crazy?", he was insinuating that if Sark had stayed, UW would be a national title contender this year, but since everyone wanted him gone, you all are stuck with rebuilding again.

    let's just put this way, if Sark is at USC in another 3 years I'll be stunned... no way in hell he has UW in contention for a Pac12 championship regardless of how much tim he had here.
    Sark is going to win enough that it will be difficult for Haden to justify firing him, especially since Sark is Haden's hire.
    Who said Haden ' s job is secure?

    SC cared enough about football to leave Lane on the tarmac. I lust for the day UW cares for football again.

  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    yes, agreed. Haden won't be involved in the decision. Sark's record will cost Haden his job and then Sark will be met by The Smoking Man before he boards the shuttle bus to Joey's.

    image