Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Most populist POTUS ever

24

Comments

  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,102 Standard Supporter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,811 Standard Supporter
    edited July 5

    Not trading one tax for another.

    Eliminating subjective valuation and tax on unrealized “gains”


    Also returning taxation to local jurisdiction to be determined by the consent of those taxed/governed for the purpose the governed deem a priority

    If the locality wishes to tax its occupants via levy, so be it. If they want to base it on income, ok. If they want to apply excise or sales tax based on consumption, that’s fine. But the method by which infrastructure and services are funded is not controlled by far off bureaucrats and politicians.

    Cities would be allowed to compete on a level playing field. Spokane wouldn’t be shackled by Olympia’s fuckery and could align their two policy to compete against Boise, for example.

    Competition would ultimately drive down costs across the nation and globally.

    Bottom up re-engineering of the state and federal tax suck. Fuck them both.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,811 Standard Supporter
    edited July 5

    Preach.

    Cut all the free shit. Bus tickets for the homeless bums - one time offer to pay for the ticket home then the free shit stops.

    Local funding of schools which could include vouchers. Competition.

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,691

    Why not just send the bums to California?

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,023 Standard Supporter

    Things I get to "vote" for generally include parks, libraries, zoos, schools. Things that generally the population supports. Things I don't get to vote for are almost everything else. Portland Metro voted down a major MAX line extension years ago. The politicians then voted to build it anyway.

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,023 Standard Supporter

    Both Oregon and Washington in the last few years had a huge increase in "education" funding. Washington due to a Washington Supreme Court case and in Oregon a defacto sales tax passed dedicated to add billions to education funding which we were promised was going to be targeted and watched over by our elite education bureacracy. Results? Dropping test scores, money put in a pile and burned and now both states screaming about education budget deficits and that the kiddies are suffering. In Oregon full time equivalent spending per public school student is equivalent to the private school funding for the Catholic Jesuit High School is southwest Portland metro area. The cost for a teacher at Jesuit is slightly less than a public school teacher. But the private schools don't have the huge administrative costs of the public school system and have the ability to require discipline in the school system. It's not the lack of spending that is the question.

  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,518 Standard Supporter

    ”Education funding”

    Right. As public school enrollment shrinks. Jefferson high in Portland is getting a 750M “renovation” this summer.

    Total enrollment is 780 kids(60% drop from twenty years ago) and the total incoming freshman class is less than100. If ever there was a project that demanded a full audit and investigation.

    But it’s Multnomah County so that money gets spent like shit through goose.