Arresting actual criminal illegal aliens within the borders of the United States is a better use of taxpayer funds.
Alternatively, the State Department is generally used to extract US citizens from foreign detention. See also Blinken extracting tranny Greiner for a notorious Russian arms dealer.
Tate Brothers are objectively awful people that you don’t want to associate with on any level.
That said when the US Government decides to fabricate charges like human trafficking through another country’s law enforcement apparatus because they don’t like their influence on social media, it’s a realproblem.
I wouldn't have wanted to associate with them 10 years ago, but I wouldn't say they're objectively awful today in 2025. Everything else you wrote is spot on
It was all about the Tate Brothers being examples of extreme masculinity and the trans/queer promoting globalists can't have that type of influence upon a western society that they are actively trying to emasculate!
Exactly, you think the dems or conflicted RINOs gave a sh*t about Epstein who makes the Tates look like saints. Or Roman Polanski? Or Diddy? Or Harvey Milk? Or Neil Goldschmidt? Or Portland mayor Sam Adams?
Comments
I really don’t understand why of all people you want to die on the Tate brothers hill.
Arresting actual criminal illegal aliens within the borders of the United States is a better use of taxpayer funds.
Alternatively, the State Department is generally used to extract US citizens from foreign detention. See also Blinken extracting tranny Greiner for a notorious Russian arms dealer.
Fuck.
In your world, posting an article about something = dying on a hill.
Unless it's a human trafficker
Tate Brothers are objectively awful people that you don’t want to associate with on any level.
That said when the US Government decides to fabricate charges like human trafficking through another country’s law enforcement apparatus because they don’t like their influence on social media, it’s a realproblem.
if that’s what happened…
You've defended him multiple times.
So?
I wouldn't have wanted to associate with them 10 years ago, but I wouldn't say they're objectively awful today in 2025. Everything else you wrote is spot on
It was all about the Tate Brothers being examples of extreme masculinity and the trans/queer promoting globalists can't have that type of influence upon a western society that they are actively trying to emasculate!
Didn’t a voicemail surface of him telling a woman that he enjoyed raping her?
Exactly, you think the dems or conflicted RINOs gave a sh*t about Epstein who makes the Tates look like saints. Or Roman Polanski? Or Diddy? Or Harvey Milk? Or Neil Goldschmidt? Or Portland mayor Sam Adams?
I haven't heard that but if it is does it mean he's a rapist? Or a hardcore troll over something?
I've watched a lot of his content over the past 2-3 years and I'm very familiar with his intelligence as well as his hubris.
The "due process" and "rule of law" team chimes in on how it's a good thing right on que.
M'eh. Lots of weird fetishes out there, rape talk being one of them.
Not my bag but its a thing.
Team Retard has specific things they are allowed to jump on. Personal destruction of those they disagree with is one
I notice @AOG dedication to due process in this thred.
huh? Read Article III and STFU.
Have AOG go read the immigration statutes and then get back to us about Article I and II. America Last.
I think AOG needs to open his house to Maryland fathers
are you so out of people to back that you have to prop these two dipshits up constantly? Seems like the bottom of the barrel is getting scraped dry.