Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I expect Carroll to establish the run tonight.......

2»

Comments

  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,815 Founders Club
    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    They actually had 6 passing plays. The 10 yard penalty was on a pass play. Anyone that has watched more than 5 minutes of football in their life could see that the passing game carried them on the first drive as well as the next 3. They had 21yds on 4 carries on the first drive. 4yds per play isn't bad, but not up to Hawk standards.

    It's actually a good thing. Their passing game is much more advanced than it was this time last year. Even at the end of last year they often started games throwing the ball, then running later. The playoff games showed this trend.

    You are trying real hard to show them as a run to set up the pass team. Not sure why you are trying so hard. Nothing wrong with them being an equally balanced offense.

    What part of "The Seahawks ran a balance attack plus played great attacking defense and had good play from their special teams return games" didn't you understand?

    I said they ran a balance offense.
    Not even close to what you said. You tried to emphasize running the ball and didn't mention a "balanced attack". Nice back pedal. Sherman has nothing on you.

    "play great offense with running the ball"
    Nice cherry pick.

    Even someone with just half a brain would notice that comment was referring to Carroll's overall style of coaching and the way his teams play.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    so far so good...looked good vs. Dumbver starters. Kearse had a k.o. return for td. Wilson made some Lockner dumbass throws..guess Hugh and I are raycissst</blo

    pretty sure the dipshit was kidding about Sounders/mariners? If not, go to doogman you sissy both. they worship mariner/sounder threads, oh and lady hoppers and softballers

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Pete never had to deal with 0-12...

    I've always thought Pete inherited a bigger mess than Sark did at UW. That roster that Pete inherited was fucking terrible.

    Sark's roster wasn't as bad as people want to make it out to be.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500

    Pete never had to deal with 0-12...

    I've always thought Pete inherited a bigger mess than Sark did at UW. That roster that Pete inherited was fucking terrible.

    Sark's roster wasn't as bad as people want to make it out to be.
    yea but still