Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Washington State Dem Congressman favors criminals over crime victims
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 66,797 
Comments
"Congressman"
”Washington State Dem Congressman”
It’s right there in the thread title, moron. “State”
Dumber than Buck/Swoop. Quite the decades-long board legacy you have there.
Can’t make this up.
Go on.
Oh, semantics.
The safe refuge for unintelligent pedants.
Congressman
Really changes the content of the video for you, eh?
H is tackling the major issues of the day.
Your meltdown since inauguration is a gift. Hope you stroke out soon!
Goodman is a nice guy, but not very smart. He's been down there 10 years past his expiration date.
Also known as the biggest stoner in the legislature going 15+ years back and would get high behind the buildings at the capitol.
Meltdown accusations have to be the biggest tell on the bored.
Stupid of him to have gotten into a back and forth with a gotcha “journalist”.
Public reporting makes it pretty clear that the prosecutor’s office fucked up the case being discussed.
A “Gotcha!” journalist who asked him a direct question about a current event.
It’s best that politicians hide from any questioning outside of friendly propagandists.
Someone has crush on fatso.
And her “direct” questioning concerned a case that the prosecution had fucked up beyond recognition. Not something a “Congressman” could fix.
Someone has crush on fatso.
Don’t flatter yourself, fatso. @HuskyJW might be interested though, based on his Duck board posts.
H trying to derail the subject by arguing for precise language. "Telling" i wouldn't want to have to defend this either.
Unauthorized citizen
Unhoused
Reproductive rights
Latinx
All terms that singlehandedly eradicated the issue they represent.
This isn’t that hard, ladies. Brandi looks at a piece of legislation in the Congress of Washington State, then points out that a guy who already benefited from the prosecution’s incompetence will benefit more as an argument against the legislation.
You gals lap it up.
Don't forget "gender affirming care"