Hey, no shame in getting your ass kicked by Rutgers...
this appears to be a good Rutgers team.
Comments
-
I take it all back, you got beat by a shitty Rutgers team.
-
No shame in naming a field after a sub .500 hack like Rich Brooks or maybe two bowl games between the Kennedy shooting and the pick.
-
Sweet fucking Geezus. Who the field is named after? Really? Is that the best you have Bill? That's the biggest burn you have, who the field is named after? I guess when you get your ass destroyed by your rival you grasp at any straws you can.
-
Hey Bill didn't you cunts build a statue to a full blown racist who barely had a winning record?
Last 8 years with the team he had 2 winning seasons, including a 2 and 9 and a 1 and 9 record with no Bowl appearances. Fucking screams "build a statute" for that fucker.
-
Weak. You fags love Rich because you got you the first Rose Bowl in 75 years or something. Real powers and bluebloods oust average coaches in three years.
-
And you fags built a statue for fucking racist who had just as many losing seasons as he did winning. His record the last ten years at UW was 49 and 53. With zero Bowl appearances.
Who builds a statue to a racist loser? Confederates and Huskie fans it appears.
-
Real powers and bluebloods oust average coaches in three years.
Explains why you kept Owens around for having a losing record over his last 10 years. Must have been his racism that you guys liked so much. Btw, who is claiming Oregon was a power or a Blueblood back then? We are now, but we weren't then and I don't know anyone who claims otherwise. Meanwhile you cunts claim to have been the superior program and the Conference power and you guys sucked the last 10 years of the guy you ended up building a statue to
-
A. Naming a field is stupid no matter who it’s for.
B. Who the fuck would care what anyone else names their field?
-
Bill, Bill would care. Or at least pretend he cares because he is so butthurt over Oregon's success.
-
He had bowl appearances if it's who I think it is. You don't know what you're talking about, yet again, Bob.
