Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
OFFICIAL HARDCORE HUSKY PAC-10 POWER RANKINGS
TierbsHsotBoobs
Member Posts: 39,680
Methodology: Everyone in this conference sucks. I'm ranking the teams by conference points scored divided by conference points allowed because I can't think of any other way to do it. Can't use +/- because of differences in number of games played.
-------------- fucking dreckfest --------------
1. Washington (44/27 = 1.63)
2. Stanford (64/43 = 1.49)
3. USC (110/84 = 1.31)
4. UCLA (120/99 = 1.21)
5. Oregon (104/92 = 1.13)
6. Arizona (106/97 = 1.09)
7. Utah (57/56 = 1.02)
8. Cal (171/195 = 0.88) -- still way too damn high
9. ASU (103/120 = 0.86)
10. OSU (46/66 = 0.70)
-------------- fucking dreckfest --------------
1. Washington (44/27 = 1.63)
2. Stanford (64/43 = 1.49)
3. USC (110/84 = 1.31)
4. UCLA (120/99 = 1.21)
5. Oregon (104/92 = 1.13)
6. Arizona (106/97 = 1.09)
7. Utah (57/56 = 1.02)
8. Cal (171/195 = 0.88) -- still way too damn high
9. ASU (103/120 = 0.86)
10. OSU (46/66 = 0.70)
Comments
-
WE'RE BACK!!!!!!
-
I approve this methodology, as well as contraction.
WDWTA. -
WSU is way too fucking high
-
LOL, I love it when Boobs puts these out five minutes after Auburndoog's. It always cracks me up.
-
Lol at TheGlove.
-
I put 5.5 minutes of effort into my rankings.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LOL, I love it when Boobs puts these out five minutes after Auburndoog's. It always cracks me up.
-
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
-
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
-
1999 was the worst ever:Mosster47 said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.Mosster47 said:USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team
This year isn't that bad.
