I 100% believe that they want someone other than Smith and Novasad to back him up but Moore is the guy next year. He was pushing Gabriel in fall camp and the coaches/players are all in on him as the starter in 2025. He’s less of a runner and more of a scrambler to make plays on the move with his arm than either Nix or Gabriel but is just as accurate and has the arm to make any throw he wants. I’m more than confident in that succession plan.
Lanning's losses, if we get to count 14-1 twice, are to teams with a combined record of 64-7. 2 "neutral" (lol Atlanta vs ugga, Rob Mullens you fucking cuck), 2 road and 1 home(I forget which team).
What I'm asking is, given the NIL spend estimates that have been disclosed by the NCAA, Washington isn't that far behind Oregon in spend. If that's true, then what is the problem? Why haven't they done it? Did they get the kid sitting on the bench now for free? Was he not paid?
I honestly don't understand all the "we can't afford it" talk. Does anyone here actually know the spend or the budget and the spend?
Comments
Give me odds? Oregon doesn't bring in a transfer QB you give Derek $60. They do, I do $20.
I 100% believe that they want someone other than Smith and Novasad to back him up but Moore is the guy next year. He was pushing Gabriel in fall camp and the coaches/players are all in on him as the starter in 2025. He’s less of a runner and more of a scrambler to make plays on the move with his arm than either Nix or Gabriel but is just as accurate and has the arm to make any throw he wants. I’m more than confident in that succession plan.
lol
Dante "Moore money, more problems" will do everything it takes to win the game.
I'm hearing it's a good possibility Ducks lose their OC.
He's the best player on the field. Enough said on that
Sounds like we're fucked at QB next year. Sigh. Why even play the games?
Lanning actually has to play some tuff road games next year
Lanning has lost 2 (?) road games in 3 years if I'm not mistaken. UW and Oregon State
yeah butt still
Lanning's losses, if we get to count 14-1 twice, are to teams with a combined record of 64-7. 2 "neutral" (lol Atlanta vs ugga, Rob Mullens you fucking cuck), 2 road and 1 home(I forget which team).
Is there any reason Washington can’t do that? Has it not done that? If not, why not?
I can't even tell with you.
If there is a QB out there who fits the mold and who UW can afford, absolutely.
Williams will need to be pushed.
Is there any reason why neutral site games are only played in like 3 NFL stadiums?
I dunno but I hate it. CCGs and playoff games should have home field advantage until the natty.
Probably will get more on campus games soon enough when the playoff expands again
What I'm asking is, given the NIL spend estimates that have been disclosed by the NCAA, Washington isn't that far behind Oregon in spend. If that's true, then what is the problem? Why haven't they done it? Did they get the kid sitting on the bench now for free? Was he not paid?
I honestly don't understand all the "we can't afford it" talk. Does anyone here actually know the spend or the budget and the spend?
No
Oregon has an entire administration and infrastructure devoted to recruiting and winning. That's how you get buy in
Washington's problem isn't money it's the retardation of fucking shit up every couple years
That's not a good investment