Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
How many Dwags would start for Oregon?
BleachedAnusDawg
Member Posts: 11,755
Based on what I saw tonight, zero.
Going into the game I thought an argument could be made for Coleman and Boston. Maybe Bruener on defense.
The talent gap is massive.
Comments
Anyone who's ever played team sports knows an overall overmatched team can make great players much less effective
Boston, Coleman. Giles would be WR 4? I haven't paid enough attention to UW's defense to know if guys like Prysock or Bruener would start. Oregon's IOL and safeties aren't great either, so prolly someone there too.
I could see Boston getting a payday from Oregon for next season
He's exactly what their WR group is missing.
optimistically maybe five, not counting special teams
it's okay though, 2037 will be special
James is better than coleman. Boston would be the Troy Franklin on this year’s team. He’s a beast
Maybe, but not more physically gifted.
James is gay.
Oregon’s IOL are safe.
Coleman and Boston, maybe Dixon when teams go 3 wide That's it that's all
Bruener is a legacy kid, but if he wasn't, we'd look at him slightly above Manu and Wellington, and on par with Sirmon. He isn't starting for Oregon.
Yeah that was a dumbass thing to say.
Bruener has actually made plays though. I can’t remember Manu or Wellington even making a routine tackle, it was like they were actively trying to get out of the way. For a couple years he was Chris Stevens?, the guy who was undersized and didn’t get a ton of PT but would make a huge play every time he snuck onto the field.
He’s probably closer to Ben Mahdavi.
I prefer we don’t take any of your IOL
Boston for sure.
Dixon would start over Jabbar.
Coleman I think would. He'd be an absolute monster behind that OL.
Kam Fab probably starts.
Bruener might start.
I think that's the list.
Bruener gets extra love for being a legacy guy and a true DWAG but comparing him to Manu and Wellington is pretty insane. Those guys were like this year's OL but for LB. Even comparing him to Sirmon isn't fair. He might be closer to BBK than Sirmon if we're talking try hard (white) LBs or to Bieria if we want to be more complex. One thing that shows how Bruener has more range than Sirmon is he had five picks in four seasons and Sirmon had two in the six he played.
Ideally, Bruener is more used like he was last year than an every down guy and he's a very ideal version of that.
Just had an idea. “Keyshawn’s Birria.”
Mmmm…deliciosa!