Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Dems working harder than ever and learned their lesson
PurpleJ
Member Posts: 37,643 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
we had to elect a felon
'cuz democrats
Who’s a felon? Trump?
convicted even
Let the TugCon semantics begin!
In a kangaroo court by a corrupt judge who backed off
oh naturally
"backed off"
Hey Atticus, what is the underlying federal crime that Trump was convicted of that made his Accounts Payable payments a felony?
100% stick to this. Never let it go.
It's working for you.
hh hard at work on the dick conveyor belt
This isn't a discussion of what will persuade downtrodden rubes in Red States. I'm not running for anything but Shittiest Tug Libtard. Please vote early and often.
When's the sentencing for the case the appeal court said they had no idea how he charged him since there was never an underlying felony charge to reactivate the misdemeanors enacted by a special law that was passed to target Trump but you do you!
not remotely what any appeals court said
but why would you let that stop you?
Ok an upper court I didn't log it into my memory and they certainly did say that or very similar.
The charging document doesn't reference any federal law and neither did the state's closing argument or the judge's jury instructions.
Just don't call it a religion and don't mention the Spanish Inquisition or 1984 or any lyrics from Rush's "Subdivision" like "Conform or be cast out".
https://ace.mu.nu/
The Left Is Demanding That People Disconnect From Their Suppressive Person (SP) Family Members Again, So You Know This Must Be the Holiday Season
—Ace
It's a standard cult move to demand that people separate from their families. Or from anyone else who might question cult doctrine.
The headline refers specifically to Scientology's terminology for disowning family members and "Suppressive Persons," meaning people who try to impede you from growing in the "church."
That is, a suppressive person is anyone who tells you you're in a cult. The cult demands you separate from -- "disconnect" from, in Scientology lingo -- anyone who points out that the cult you're in is acting a lot like a cult.
Which brings us to this lovely letter from a New York Times reader, written to the Times' "expert" on ethics.
The basic question: My mother refuses to say who she voted for. My wife and her sister demand I disown my own mother, because the fact that she even leaves open the possibility that I voted for Trump means that she's an SP. Should I disconnect from her?
His own mother.
Your nonsense post is something out of Lovecraft or Matheson. What the fuck is this shit? Who is "Ace"?
Get real. Also get fucked, especially this week.
That being said, I'm thankful for you helping me laugh, in the spirit of the season. Cheers.
You have to love a liberal meltdown. Ern can't stand the fact that 1000's of rats are disowning their families and spouses because they voted for Trump. I guess all the articles, talk shows with rat therapists telling other rats its ok to disown family over the election, the 1000's of videos with rat women declaring their intent to abstain from sex, marriage and having children due to the election is not proof enough for ern.
But who is Ace right? What a fucking weak minded dodge of the truth.
Still waiting for you to tell me which underlying federal crime Trump was convicted of that makes these filings “felonies,” Atticus.
Everything with you Leftists is just bullshit. Do you get tired of the lies?
What are you blathering about?
Just calling out your bullshit.
Even flatworms turn away from a small electric shock. Need a Trump cattle prod to start some movement with leftards. Newsom is still pretending he would be a serious candidate in 2028. Hochul moving to the center on immigration, sort of, ;ike she wants to be able to win a national election. Might be tough to get a fake moderate as the actual dem nominee. Still don't think dem Senators and RINOs will get behind real deportation.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/12/are-liberals-raising-the-white-flag-on-immigration.php
Are Liberals Raising the White Flag on Immigration?All of a sudden even liberal politicians, here and abroad, are publicly confessing “concern” about unlimited immigration. Justin Trudeau hopped the first plane to Mar-a-Lago after Trump threatened Canada with 25 percent tariffs if they don’t stop bad actors from exploiting our northern border. (A 25% tariff on Canada would have a significant impact on Canada’s economy.) But before departing Trudeau posted this:
Over in Britain, Prime Minister Kier Starmer, whose public approval rating has sunk fastest ever for a new PM as more than 1 million migrants have decamped to Britain in the last year, is starting to feel the heat:
And here in the U.S., while some Democratic strongholds like Denver say they won’t cooperate with Trump’s deportation plans, some Democrats are breaking ranks:
Meanwhile, more Democrats are coming forward to say, “Boy, Biden really blew it.”
Of course, admitting “political malpractice” is not the same as admitting that allowing millions of migrants across the border is a bad idea in itself. The Labour Party in Britain under Tony Blair deliberately increased immigration on the view that it would help the Labour Party, just as Democrats believe that more immigration to the U.S. will turn the entire country into California. Don’t believe these tidings. The left is just beating a strategic retreat until it can resume its attempt to engineer a new electorate.
The election may have shaken the left’s premise, however, as Michael Barone argues in the Wall Street Journal yesterday: