Next stop the Senate?

So, a convicted male sex felon goes to a women only nude spa and is kicked out. The Washington Human Rights Commission rules that women have no rights and have to admit the male. They appeal. A Clinton judge supports the Washington commission. You think anyone running for a dem Senate seat in Washington is going to back the women spa owners or female customers? Clearly, neither Patty or Maria nor the dementia patient nor Headboard or the dem Senate majority leader or the House minority leader is willing to take on the transgender mafia. You think open border Marie is going to to be the one?

Nov 19, 2024, 6:00 AM | Updated: 6:07 am

BY JASON RANTZ

AM 770 KTTH host

In a puzzling and offensive exchange, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judge likened a female-only Olympus Spa policy to a “whites-only” policy. The remark was made during a federal appeals court hearing in which Olympus Spa is challenging the state of Washington for mandating the admission of transgender women (biological men) into the spa via the Washington Human Rights Commission.

Olympus Spa is a traditional Korean spa with locations in Tacoma and Lynnwood that operates under a “female-only policy” restricting transgender women unless they have “gone through post-operative sex confirmation surgery,” according to court documents. The spa cites the rule as “essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers.”

The policy is based on the owner’s Christian values that demand “modesty as between the sexes” and that “a male and female should not ordinarily be in each other’s presence while in the nude unless married to each other.” The spa attracts deeply religious customers. It also has employees who “refuse to perform massages or body scrubs on naked men.”

But Judge M. Margaret McKeown appeared skeptical of a female-only admissions policy.

“If you have a law that says ‘white applicants only,’ this is ‘biological women entrance only.’ It seems to me they’re quite parallel there,” McKeown said. “And you can’t have ‘white people only’ come into my restaurant, and then you say, ‘Well, no, we have a religious, spiritual nature to our restaurant, and when you get there, we serve you special food.’ This seems quite different.”

Marie barely won her re-election based on abortion. Kent is an abortion absolutist and decided that a compromise position was untenable and it was more important to put an unlimited abortion support back in office. Marie voted against the House Bill H.R. 2 which would have had actual border security. You leftards like to pretend that supporting amnesty with a promise of some sort of actual border security in the future and a vague promise of some deportations is actual border security. Can't find the campaign ad but it was effective showing how much Marie was interested in actual border security. She later went on to mouth the same border security sh*t that Chuck Schumer supports.

https://www.nrcc.org/2024/01/13/marie-gluesenkamp-perez-says-nobody-stays-awake-at-night-over-border-crisis/

House Dem in Trump district takes heat for saying ‘nobody stays awake at night’ over border crisis
Fox News
Adam Shaw

A Washington state Democrat in a district that voted for former President Trump is under fire from Republicans for comments last year in which she said that “nobody stays up at night” because of the crisis at the southern border.

Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., who won her seat in an upset in 2022, was on Pod Save America in March when she made the comments about the ongoing border crisis — arguing that most Americans have other things to worry about.

“Listen, nobody stays awake at night worrying about the southern border,” she said. “That’s just not…people stay awake at night worrying that their kid is gonna relapse or that, you know, someone’s going to drop out of school or they’re going to lose their house.”