Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rats are the real election deniers

BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,063 Standard Supporter

For those of you who aren't following, democrats are cheating again. What they are doing in PA is illegal according to their own Supreme Court. They are counting votes that are deemed disqualified by PA state law and even though those democrats in charge of counting in those four counties have been told what they are doing is illegal, they continue to count. Why do they continue to draw this out? They see that many of the disqualified are voting for Bob Casey the incumbent Democrat, and if enough votes are counted for Casey, it would require a re-count. A re-count gives those corrupt democrats yet another chance to cheat and give this election to Bob Casey.

The race has been called for the Republican challenger. Bob Casey knows this but because his team is cheating, he refused to concede.

The incredible hypocrisy on display from rat leadership and their goose stepping msm is not shocking but it is uber revealing when it comes to who the election deniers and cheaters really are.

New York Times Loves 'Election Deniers' If They're Democrat

For four years, Democrats and their media allies smeared Republicans as traitors to “democracy” for questioning the 2020 election results. It didn’t matter that the election was riddled with irregularities or that in Fulton County, Georgia, for example, more than 3,000 ballots were double scanned. The left-wing corporate media’s message was clear: questioning the outcome of an an election was tantamount to the Civil War.

But now that Democrats are the ones not only denying the results of an election but actively working to rig the outcome. The hypocrisy is impossible to ignore. Instead of calling out blatant lawlessness, the Times offered a sympathetic “twist” and spins this affront to election integrity as nothing more than a friendly disagreement between local officials who want to enfranchise all voters and the courts.

The double standard only affirms what’s been known all along: The left’s obsession with labeling Republicans as election deniers was never about defending the integrity (or lack thereof) of our elections. For Democrats and the propaganda press, election integrity is secondary to winning.

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.