How the f has Arizona not finished...
Comments
-
Then why are you so riled up about Lake’s words about abortion that you’ve assigned meaning to, Margaret?
You get so upset about abortion posts. It’s weird for a man in his 60s to act this way.
-
Posted the official stats from the Arizona election count. 15k ballot injection. Maybe read the thread.
-
already been posted
weird voter discrepancies in Pima and Maricopa Counties
-
I said:
My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?Your answer was no. I’m not putting words in your mouth.
-
Because you assume she should get the same percentages as other Republicans. That’s a poor assumption. She has alienated various AZ Republican voters.
-
Abortion is an issue she lost some Republican votes on. That is among the reasons she is likely to lose.
-
There you go moving the goalposts again. Let's look at what your point was when I said "enlighten me" after you said I missed the point...This was your response....Calling 60 - 70% of the electorate sinners or, at least, sinful isn’t the best political strategy. Also, saying you “changed [your] mind” a mere two years later actually makes you look even worse.There is nothing in that response about ...
My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
You said ...
Well, we both agree she didn't really change her mind. If you want to quibble about whether she literally said she did or not, you aren't really disputing my point. She did call for the repeal of the "great law" she had previously cited.
I said I didn't agree that we agreed because you flip-flopped from her saying it versus that's what you assumed she meant.
Now you are changing the whole thing and saying..
So you see her losing as evidence of the election being stolen from her. Okay.
Never once did I say anything about any evidence having to do with here winning or losing nor was it in your "enlightening explanation" of your point.
This is absolutely ridiculous and you are so freaking dishonest and ARE trying to put word in my mouth.
-100 and screw you!
DTM
-
So you want to take both sides of a yes or no question. You seem a little touchy about it though. I suspect you grasp the problem with it.
-
DTM means Dead To Me
You have zero credibility and have earned the one and only "fuck off" I have given to anyone.
You earned it!
You misrepresented your source as fact and when you got called on it you changed the whole discussion into a word games and are now trying to trap me into a position that was never part of your "point" that you couldn't back up and I have never commented in regard to.
You should be banned from this site for this despicable behavior. You are dishonest and do not deserve one more comment from me.
I reject any comment, assumptions or false implication of my opinion that I have not explicitly expressed that you make prior to or following this poast.
You are..... DTM !
Good day!
-
Dazzler cheers the criminals stealing elections. What a guy. What a citizen. What an evil dumbass maroon!



