Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Cal too high
creepycoug
Member Posts: 23,230
This game has all the earmarks of a Crisco debacle, though I recall he didn't struggle with Cal while at Oregon.
I really am not that hyped about Miami yet and have learned to not overly invest w/o a lot more proof, so I don't really care what happens. But I'd be lying if I said I really don't want to lose to Cal. It's just especially embarrassing for some reason. Like, sure, lose to UCLA or someone like that. Just as shitty and sometimes more so than Cal. But there is a certain smell on your clothes after a Cal loss. It is unbearable.
Please Crisco. At least try and run the ball off tackle and tell your QB to tuck the ball away when he runs. And tell him Cal has an all senior D backfield that produces INTs.
Fuck.
Comments
I’m rooting against Cal in this one. Let’s send them back to the 18th century.
Love me some dumbass Cam Ward.
This is amazing.
Cal dominating like the juggernaught program that they are… the ACC can’t help but notice and be afraid ~ very afraid.
I’m glad these other conferences are getting a taste of PAC-12 football.
That was the worst targeting non-call I’ve ever seen. This game should be over. Fuck the canes, the fix is in.
V. Tech got jobbed in favor of Miami and tonight Cal gets jobbed (despite giving up 29 unanswered).
If THAT was not targeting, there is no such thing as targeting. Crown of the helmet, lowered, and driven right into the side of the Cal QB's head.
I’m going to rule that out of order.
@dtd focus on your own retarded QB and get out of my thread.
shut up you weff whining faggot.
the cam-jeanty-hunter race is going to be great
Hunter for Heisman IMO. Best player in the game and not close.
I gave out Miami -10 to all my gambling friends. I am so bad at gambling it’s insane
77 total points? Wtf? How did cal score 38 and lose
Miami scored 39.
I gave up at 35-10
Cal lol
DHDMember, Swaye's WigwamPosts: 1,466
October 5
V. Tech got jobbed in favor of Miami and tonight Cal gets jobbed (despite giving up 29 unanswered).If THAT was not targeting, there is no such thing as targeting. Crown of the helmet, lowered, and driven right into the side of the Cal QB's head.I agree, on top of that the tackler was guilty of launching with the crown of his helmet as the initial point of contact with the obvious result of the Qb's helmet jerking at contact. Booth must not have had that angle ~ TV broadcast was so conclusive as to leave no doubt.
So close but yet so Cal
The last touchdown also had 2 ineligible receivers downfield. Two lineman were blocking in the end zone.
I recall an Orange Bowl loss by Miami to Wisconsin. There was as flagrant a PI call in the end zone on Wisc as you find that not only denied Miami A TD but directly caused an int. It was at a key point in the game, everybody saw it, and Miami’s erratic QB play was such that they could not afford to have TDs taken off the board.
when they lost and I came here and bitched, I was told very clearly that crying about the weffs was not allowed.
So when you faggots start complaining about Washington getting the benefit of a shitty call or no call it will be the first time and then I’ll listen to your queefing about Miami weff conspiracy theories. It’s football, the kid was running and he got as much of his shoulder as helmet. IDFC and neither should you.
Fuck off now with your new found interest in targeting righteousness. Faggots.