Absolute immunity
Comments
-
The president was running guns to the cartels and ISIS. Yet he's walking around free…
-
So hypothetically if Biden loses he could hypothetically order the hypothetical elimination of Mr Trump given that he actually is a threat to democracy.
-
-
Assassinating an elected President-elect because he is a “threat to Democracy” would make Biden a clear “threat to Democracy” and he’d be prosecuted and court-martialed.
That’s not at all what the SCOTUS decision allows but you Retards get fed talking points and spout them as factual.
You Leftists are completely unhinged and it’s rapidly reaching mass psychosis.
-
I'm just referencing the decision. Biden could argue that he was acting in an official capacity. SCOTUS granted absolute immunity to offical actions. So it comes down to convincing a jury that his actions were official.
-
Bull shit
-
Where is it in the official duties of a President to order and execute the President-elect who just defeated you?
This is nonsensical and shows how desperate Democrats are to hold onto power.
-
Would love to see how this polls.
-
The ruling today gives absolute immunity for actions taken in an official capacity. But it's impossible to make a list of official duties since the president could argue virtually any action is official. So in the hypothetical case of assassination of a rival, the president could argue it was his official duty, provide evidence, try to persuade the jury. That example was provided in the dissenting opinion. The jury would probably not buy it, but like any trial it depends on the evidence, jury, etc. The point is that a president can seriously present such an argument now.
-
he could.
He could also get hung up Mussolini style by the military for making such a fucking stupid order.
