Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?

He’s wrong on supporting more money for a lost cause. You think in binary terms; Oppose money for Ukraine means one supports Putin. That’s childlike thinking.

I think in weighs annd balances and see which candidate most follows my ideology. I don’t have to defend every mistake from Drumpf or everything I disagree with from him. I’ve never seen a Leftist here deviate from protecting the Democrat Party no matter what, to the point they are now defending pedophilia on this very board.

I take the time to answer him and this @PostGameOrangeSlices Lightweight pigeon-shits as his reply. Simply cannot think in anything other than a binary “all/nothing” manner.

As Seymour Hersh recently reported, CIA Director Burns had to warn Zelensky to stop stealing so much money.

The issue of corruption was directly raised with Zelensky in a meeting last January in Kiev with CIA Director William Burns. 

His message to the Ukrainian president, I was told by an intelligence official with direct knowledge of the meeting, was out of a 1950s mob movie. 

The senior generals and government officials in Kiev were angry at what they saw as Zelensky’s greed, so Burns told the Ukrainian president, because “he was taking a larger share of the skim money than was going to the generals.” 

Burns also presented Zelensky with a list of thirty-five generals and senior officials whose corruption was known to the CIA and others in the American government. 

Zelensky responded to the American pressure ten days later by publicly dismissing ten of the most ostentatious officials on the list and doing little else. 

“The ten he got rid of were brazenly bragging about the money they had—driving around Kiev in their new Mercedes,” the intelligence official told me. 

Zelensky’s half-hearted response and the White House’s lack of concern was seen, the intelligence official added, as another sign of a lack of leadership that is leading to a “total breakdown” of trust between the White House and some elements of the intelligence community.

EeeeeeeeeeeeeeYup. For all practical purposes, the Russkies have already won, much to the dismay of PGOS & Co.

A warm-water port has been a top priority for Russia since WW2.

Thank you for the Obama Era Coup d' Tat that finally gave it to them.

PGOS: You really are dumber than a box of rocks. And a little baby, too.

So, however much it costs and however long it lasts is still the mantra? I thought Russia was on the rocks and are we just next year's spring offensive from total victory?