Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW was 2 plays away from possibly winning a national title

245678

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,850 Founders Club

    I hope all the buttholes that ruined college football are happy with themselves. Let's have a school be a few plays away from having a shot at a Natty (or not) to being 6-6 the following year. Great way to keep the fans invested.

  • Quietcowskee
    Quietcowskee Member Posts: 4,443 Standard Supporter

    I might have a to actually rewatch that game some time because of you fuckers🤔🤔

  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,910 Founders Club
    edited April 2024

    I've spent too much time griping about this game on here but will still take any open door to do so. I know I'm watching replays with Doog (albeit negadoog) colored glasses, but it really feels like there were 10-15 (if not more) what if? plays for UW that almost happened where Michigan hit like 10/15 of their what if? plays. I can bitch again about new shit I've seen like Muhammad committing to do a dramatic rejection slap of a McCarthy duck instead of going for a pick six , but I still think with how limited our defense was and a broken RB we needed Penix to be damn near perfect to beat a Texas or Michigan and he wasn't, and was actually pretty bad. Every rewatch I'm reminded more how well Odunze and the WRs and TEs were doing.

    Michigan had a deeper roster, especially on defense, even though they didn't have as much top end talent and the way the game played out really played into that. Michigan's offense legit did nothing for what almost three full quarters and only did something late when they got away with a hold which prevented a likely massive sack by ZTF. Fuck the wefs forever.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,018 Founders Club

    Ty Willingham and his three plays will change the game is enjoying this

    TBF Ty usually lost by 50 which is what made it funny

    I have not watched a replay and probably won't. Lot of what ifs that added up to a loss

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,259

    You'd be better suited to be an Oregon fan with your pond scum social skills

    I never said a single thing about TCU in my initial post … why you are referencing them here just highlights how much of a bitch you are

    If you can't understand where UW had weaknesses in its roster last year and how it impacted their ability to win that last game then you're just further proving the idiot that you are

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,259

    If Sugar Bowl Penix showed up in Houston, then there would be a decent chance that UW won a Natty … but he didn't

    IF that is the margin of error that you're comfortable with then that's fine … I would suggest that there's some lessons to learn from it

    The T's were good enough the entire season but Roger struggled a bit at times against Michigan. The interior G's were probably above average overall but struggled against some of Michigan's interior DL rotation. Your run game largely comes from the interior OL and against Texas and Michigan the ability to run the ball wasn't really there.

    Dillon's injury issues and the lack of (trusted) depth behind him was a critical gap in providing a balanced offense … that really shouldn't happen at a place like UW

    The interior of the DL was largely full of JAGs and that got exposed against both Texas and Michigan … depth was also an issue and Michigan's ability to rotate guys in/out that will all largely be rotational players (at worse) in the NFL takes its toll after a while

    LB play on the whole was probably better than expected last season but I'd argue that UW's LBs were more specialist in nature instead of having any real 3 down difference makers … there were enough games where the D struggled with the run to say that it was an elite group

    Yes, in the game vs Michigan the D did a good job of adjusting and getting stops for 2+ quarters … I think it's also important to keep in mind though that with the way the game was going that Michigan didn't need to step out of its shell and try to do too much. In a similar sense of UW playing Alabama, it became fairly clear with the way the game was unfolding that UW was going to need an easy score to be able to get over the hump and the opposition managed the game that way

    I could go into a couple of other points but this will suffice for now