There’s just NO evidence

And the rest? The missing $4,960,000?

I do believe that's what she was told. So "Hearsay!", as you girls like to point out in order to "win" a point that wasn't in controversy. Ornato can't really recall, but I wonder why he and Engel would make it up if it was false.

We know some of Bobulinski's motives to lie, and suspect others (Comrades). And frankly, he doesn't have to lie too much because he's offered next to nothing but innuendo anyway.

The fact that he and Hunter hate each other's guts comes into it. And that's without even following-up on the extent to which Bobulinski profits from his multiple links to Russian interests.

Probably. But as I said—and you ignored—it's also very personal.

Daddy's problem is that: (1) even his pals aren't totally willing to perjure themselves; and (2) there is lots of documentation and audio recordings.

Bobulinski is mostly selling the proposition that his testimony (smoke) supports the inference of something meaningful (fire).

Nice thread, @HHusky

JFC, what an idiot.

Noevidence at all...