Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fani

Sledog
Sledog Member Posts: 38,631 Standard Supporter

So the judge. who donated to her campaign, will allow her to stay on after testifying under oath that there was no affair with her special prosecutor? So perjury isn't really a crime? This is what Biden's America looks like. There is no rule of law folks. Want to commit all the crimes you want? Register as a demonrat!

The insanity!

«134

Comments

  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,493 Standard Supporter

    You have to be willingly obtuse to not see a conflict of interest but hey…democrats got what they voted for and they’re loving this.


    big win for @HHusky and @MelloDawg

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,631 Standard Supporter

    Yet the dems are saying the republicans will weaponize the justice system if they win the election!

  • Blueduck
    Blueduck Member Posts: 1,680 Standard Supporter

    He's being controlled.... Im guessing he was sent a picture of Antonin Scalias pillow

    McAfee is also campaigning for reelection, as I understand, he was initially appointed?

    He needs to not piss off those who can help him keep his job.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360

    She didn't testify there was no affair.

    Do you girls ever get anything right?

  • EverettChris
    EverettChris Member Posts: 8,622 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2024

    It’s already known you’re a liar and an unethical piece of shit. What I wonder is what brought you to this point in life, where kissing Authoritarian Ass for free on a small internet forum is something you’ve literally spent months in hours of your life doing for what I guess is fun to you?

    I think my favorite part of your idiocy is when you pull a “have you read the ruling” when it’s obvious you have not, such in this instance. Fani lied in the stand, that’s not in doubt anymore, but Democrats are never held accountable which is why we get protected, token, DEI Dipshits hired like Willis to be ordered around by white people. Can’t touch here because she has Black Female Privilege even though she has the IQ of Lenny.

  • EverettChris
    EverettChris Member Posts: 8,622 Standard Supporter

    Judge was running unopposed until he got this case. Rats ran a competitor after it started.

    Typical Democrat politics. Rule against the black DA and lose your seat when the votes are counted. There is no equal justice in these Rat cities.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360

    Takes a special kind of retarded to see the judge's ruling as anything but a rebuke of her judgment and skepticism about how she spun her testimony—you really should have read it. Her boyfriend has to leave.

    Still, Daddy and the gang are guilty as fuck and Fani's stupidity really doesn't alter that fact.

    Sorry this forum is too small time for you.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,610 Founders Club
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,291 Founders Club

    Big win for Fani. Lots of damage done to this case regardless of today's decision. Never sees trial. Take your screenshots.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,610 Founders Club

    I've read Judge McAfee's opinion even more closely now, and I think it has one big legal flaw (that others have hinted at)

    He found, factually, that the "District Attorney's prosecution is encumbered by an appearance of impropriety" and that it came about as result of "specific conduct, and impacts more than a 'nebulous' public interest because it concerns a public prosecutor."

    He also found that "an odor of mendacity remains" and that "reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully...further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety."

    McAfee also held that an appearance of impropriety can warrant disqualification of individual prosecutors, BUT not the prosecutor's office as a whole, and further held that removing Wade would "cure" the appearance of impropriety.

    I just don't think this last legal holding can survive appellate scrutiny. The appearance of impropriety implicates BOTH Willis and Wade. There are reasonable questions about whether Willis testified truthfully and about whether she financially gained from the prosecution. Those questions don't just go away if Wade withdraws.

    Further, the cases Judge McAfee cites for the proposition that an appearance of impropriety doesn't require the whole office to be DQ'd are cases where it was the line prosecutor who had the conflict issues, not the elected district attorney. When it's a line prosecutor, sure, it's easy enough to just replace that specific prosecutor and cure the issue. But when it's the elected DA who has the conflict - well, every prosecutor in the office reports to the elected DA. There's no way to remove the "odor of mendacity" without removing the entire office.

    Will Chamberlain