Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Big Brother is watching your Fakebook and XXXXXXXX
Comments
-
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46. -
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish. -
I live 100 miles away.HHusky said:
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.
People got fired simply for criticizing BLM and other leftist causes a few years ago. My favorite local sports talk guy got canned just for that. I understand it if it's public and they threaten others, or use slurs. The government doesn't have the right and should not be engaged in policing the political opinions of its public employees. It's the work of busy body, SJW, loser bureaucrats who are trying to move up and get attention. Don't complain when you lose even more rights. -
BLM and antifa are overtly violent communist organizations. They have no moral superiority to being a Nazi. But Team Dazzler doesn't believe in equal justice under the law and so opposing open borders, the sexual mutilation of children and unlimited abortion gets you labeled a white supremacist and getting cancelled.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I live 100 miles away.HHusky said:
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.
People got fired simply for criticizing BLM and other leftist causes a few years ago. My favorite local sports talk guy got canned just for that. I understand it if it's public and they threaten others, or use slurs. The government doesn't have the right and should not be engaged in policing the political opinions of its public employees. It's the work of busy body, SJW, loser bureaucrats who are trying to move up and get attention. Don't complain when you lose even more rights. -
Your employer reading the stuff you choose to make public isn't fascism, no matter how hysterical you get.
You girls really need to re-read 1984. -
Everyone here knows your a raging hypocrite who likes it when your team is doing the censoringHHusky said:Your employer reading the stuff you choose to make public isn't fascism, no matter how hysterical you get.
You girls really need to re-read 1984.
Fuck off -
I fully support firing teachers and such if they are blm/hamas supporters publicly
-
Of course you can't imagine better uses of tax dollars than spying on employees.HHusky said:
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.
Tell me you're a fascist without telling me you're a fascist. Shithead. -
Seems like a place full of totally normal, well-balanced people.
-
Gilbert is pretty MAGA for a suburb.TXDawg said:Seems like a place full of totally normal, well-balanced people.
