Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Big Brother is watching your Fakebook and XXXXXXXX

123578

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,147 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

    It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

    Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?
    It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.
    Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.
    It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,559 Founders Club
    As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,920 Standard Supporter

    As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

    Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,570 Standard Supporter

    As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

    You want top or bottom bunk?

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,570 Standard Supporter

    As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

    You want top or bottom?

    Preemptive edit
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,559 Founders Club

    As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

    You want top or bottom bunk?



    Goes for the edit too. I'm versatile.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,351

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

    It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

    Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?
    It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.
    Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.
    It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?
    They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,920 Standard Supporter
    Looks like the dems favorite authority on white supremacy has determined that retweeting the tweets of leftards is illegal white supremacist hate speech and the same with saying women can't be men. We will need the dazzler, the line authority to weigh in why this is happening. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.

    https://instapundit.com/


  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Speech has consequences.

    The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.

    Nobody needs the security of Big Brother more than @HHusky the Cop Hater.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,182 Standard Supporter
    HuskyBuck said:

    HuskyBuck said:

    T

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Speech has consequences.

    The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.

    H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.
    "purporting to represent the Town. "
    If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't care
    Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?

    No shit, Einstein.

    Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.

    Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!

    No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
    Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.

    Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.

    Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.

    A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.

    Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?
    Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.
    Ahh the "critical thinker" admits that words and reading are hard for him.

    You have diagnosed the problem. Now go get yourself some remedial education you dumbass.