Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Big Brother is watching your Fakebook and XXXXXXXX
Comments
-
No substance here. Just another angry narrative. On top of that, how smart could this guy be? He can’t even find the right thread to place this post under.RaceBannon said:
You'd hate to have your spoon fed narrative challengedHuskyBuck said:
Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.Bendintheriver said:
Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.HuskyBuck said:T
Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!pawz said:
Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.HHusky said:
Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't careHHusky said:
"purporting to represent the Town. "Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.HHusky said:Speech has consequences.
The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.
No shit, Einstein.
No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.
Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.
A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.
Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is? -
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46. -
What's angry about it?HuskyBuck said:
No substance here. Just another angry narrative. On top of that, how smart could this guy be? He can’t even find the right thread to place this post under.RaceBannon said:
You'd hate to have your spoon fed narrative challengedHuskyBuck said:
Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.Bendintheriver said:
Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.HuskyBuck said:T
Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!pawz said:
Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.HHusky said:
Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't careHHusky said:
"purporting to represent the Town. "Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.HHusky said:Speech has consequences.
The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.
No shit, Einstein.
No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.
Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.
A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.
Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?
You seem angry that people know the Biden economy sucks
Rage on -
Not angry at all. I’m actually trying to help people with real, solid advice. The political rage posts on here help no one. If they suck because of the dumb things they do, it wont help them to elect Trump or whoever. They’ll still suck after that.RaceBannon said:
What's angry about it?HuskyBuck said:
No substance here. Just another angry narrative. On top of that, how smart could this guy be? He can’t even find the right thread to place this post under.RaceBannon said:
You'd hate to have your spoon fed narrative challengedHuskyBuck said:
Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.Bendintheriver said:
Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.HuskyBuck said:T
Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!pawz said:
Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.HHusky said:
Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't careHHusky said:
"purporting to represent the Town. "Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.HHusky said:Speech has consequences.
The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.
No shit, Einstein.
No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.
Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.
A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.
Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?
You seem angry that people know the Biden economy sucks
Rage on -
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46. -
Keep raging. Why so angry?HuskyBuck said:
Not angry at all. I’m actually trying to help people with real, solid advice. The political rage posts on here help no one. If they suck because of the dumb things they do, it wont help them to elect Trump or whoever. They’ll still suck after that.RaceBannon said:
What's angry about it?HuskyBuck said:
No substance here. Just another angry narrative. On top of that, how smart could this guy be? He can’t even find the right thread to place this post under.RaceBannon said:
You'd hate to have your spoon fed narrative challengedHuskyBuck said:
Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.Bendintheriver said:
Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.HuskyBuck said:T
Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!pawz said:
Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.HHusky said:
Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't careHHusky said:
"purporting to represent the Town. "Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.HHusky said:Speech has consequences.
The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.
No shit, Einstein.
No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.
Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.
A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.
Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?
You seem angry that people know the Biden economy sucks
Rage on -
I see where we’re going with this but the fact remains. Folks, there’s no reason why you cant thrive in this environment! Trust me! I know what’s possible. You can listen to smart, intelligent insight, or you can listen to this political rage, get angry, never make improvements to yourself and suck balls for the rest of your life!RaceBannon said:
Keep raging. Why so angry?HuskyBuck said:
Not angry at all. I’m actually trying to help people with real, solid advice. The political rage posts on here help no one. If they suck because of the dumb things they do, it wont help them to elect Trump or whoever. They’ll still suck after that.RaceBannon said:
What's angry about it?HuskyBuck said:
No substance here. Just another angry narrative. On top of that, how smart could this guy be? He can’t even find the right thread to place this post under.RaceBannon said:
You'd hate to have your spoon fed narrative challengedHuskyBuck said:
Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.Bendintheriver said:
Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.HuskyBuck said:T
Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!pawz said:
Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.HHusky said:
Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't careHHusky said:
"purporting to represent the Town. "Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.HHusky said:Speech has consequences.
The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.
No shit, Einstein.
No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.
Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.
A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.
Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?
You seem angry that people know the Biden economy sucks
Rage on
I’m here to help!!! -
Easy now. You sound upsetHuskyBuck said:
I see where we’re going with this but the fact remains. Folks, there’s no reason why you cant thrive in this environment! Trust me! I know what’s possible. You can listen to smart, intelligent insight, or you can listen to this political rage, get angry, never make improvements to yourself and suck balls for the rest of your life!RaceBannon said:
Keep raging. Why so angry?HuskyBuck said:
Not angry at all. I’m actually trying to help people with real, solid advice. The political rage posts on here help no one. If they suck because of the dumb things they do, it wont help them to elect Trump or whoever. They’ll still suck after that.RaceBannon said:
What's angry about it?HuskyBuck said:
No substance here. Just another angry narrative. On top of that, how smart could this guy be? He can’t even find the right thread to place this post under.RaceBannon said:
You'd hate to have your spoon fed narrative challengedHuskyBuck said:
Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.Bendintheriver said:
Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.HuskyBuck said:T
Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!pawz said:
Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.HHusky said:
Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't careHHusky said:
"purporting to represent the Town. "Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.HHusky said:Speech has consequences.
The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.
No shit, Einstein.
No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.
Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.
A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.
Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?
You seem angry that people know the Biden economy sucks
Rage on
I’m here to help!!! -
He learned it from the commie queer illegal Obunghole.Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46. -
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46. -
As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.
-
Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.UW_Doog_Bot said:As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.
-
You want top or bottom bunk?UW_Doog_Bot said:As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.
-
Preemptive editPurpleThrobber said:
You want top or bottom?UW_Doog_Bot said:As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.
-
PurpleThrobber said:
You want top or bottom bunk?UW_Doog_Bot said:As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.
Goes for the edit too. I'm versatile.
-
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46. -
Looks like the dems favorite authority on white supremacy has determined that retweeting the tweets of leftards is illegal white supremacist hate speech and the same with saying women can't be men. We will need the dazzler, the line authority to weigh in why this is happening. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
https://instapundit.com/
-
Ahh the "critical thinker" admits that words and reading are hard for him.HuskyBuck said:
Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.Bendintheriver said:
Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.HuskyBuck said:T
Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!pawz said:
Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.HHusky said:
Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't careHHusky said:
"purporting to represent the Town. "Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.HHusky said:Speech has consequences.
The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.
No shit, Einstein.
No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!
Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.
Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.
A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.
Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?
You have diagnosed the problem. Now go get yourself some remedial education you dumbass. -
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46. -
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish. -
I live 100 miles away.HHusky said:
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.
People got fired simply for criticizing BLM and other leftist causes a few years ago. My favorite local sports talk guy got canned just for that. I understand it if it's public and they threaten others, or use slurs. The government doesn't have the right and should not be engaged in policing the political opinions of its public employees. It's the work of busy body, SJW, loser bureaucrats who are trying to move up and get attention. Don't complain when you lose even more rights. -
BLM and antifa are overtly violent communist organizations. They have no moral superiority to being a Nazi. But Team Dazzler doesn't believe in equal justice under the law and so opposing open borders, the sexual mutilation of children and unlimited abortion gets you labeled a white supremacist and getting cancelled.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I live 100 miles away.HHusky said:
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.
People got fired simply for criticizing BLM and other leftist causes a few years ago. My favorite local sports talk guy got canned just for that. I understand it if it's public and they threaten others, or use slurs. The government doesn't have the right and should not be engaged in policing the political opinions of its public employees. It's the work of busy body, SJW, loser bureaucrats who are trying to move up and get attention. Don't complain when you lose even more rights. -
Your employer reading the stuff you choose to make public isn't fascism, no matter how hysterical you get.
You girls really need to re-read 1984. -
Everyone here knows your a raging hypocrite who likes it when your team is doing the censoringHHusky said:Your employer reading the stuff you choose to make public isn't fascism, no matter how hysterical you get.
You girls really need to re-read 1984.
Fuck off -
I fully support firing teachers and such if they are blm/hamas supporters publicly
-
Of course you can't imagine better uses of tax dollars than spying on employees.HHusky said:
Vote 'em out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.HHusky said:
They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?HHusky said:
Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.HHusky said:
Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?Kaepsknee said:The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.
It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.
But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.
Tell me you're a fascist without telling me you're a fascist. Shithead. -
Seems like a place full of totally normal, well-balanced people.
-
Gilbert is pretty MAGA for a suburb.TXDawg said:Seems like a place full of totally normal, well-balanced people.
