Ten percent of female University of Oregon students raped: survey

Welcome to yesterday

hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/13208/you-guys-still-need-more-time-to-get-your-own-rapists-in-there

sarktastic said:

Does anyone else find it odd that the agrarian hippy school to the South has a president named Coal Train?

Always about the blacks...

MikeDamone said:

That means 90% aren't.

Yet...

Alexis said:

There's nothing funny about Rapier Wit.

But, even back in the 80s, when I was much younger and better looking, (not really) plenty of girls would love to get drunk at the house, end up in bed with some guy, end up half naked, and then decide that maybe they didn't want to have sex. And I think I speak for all when I say, it takes a special type of guy who can just turn it off at that time. And by special, I mean gay.

I know your being sarkastic, but that's rape.

A study shows that 90% of female students at the University of Oregon have not been raped. See what I did there..........75k wink.

It's a web based survey. Hard to take that seriously.

It's very broad in its definition of rape. It asks if consent was given but nothing about the use of force.

49% of all survey takers report being involved in at least one sexual encounter without their consent. Which leads us to the consent problem and how people have defined that word into nothing. If half of your subjects report having been involved in a "rape" or attempted "rape" then there's no point in taking it seriously.

I found the number of unreported rape cases in broader studies to be around 50%. This study comes in at 90%. The reason why is because they define rape so lightly. You know who is less likely to report a rape than a rape victim? Someone that hasn't been raped.

allpurpleallgold said:

It's a web based survey. Hard to take that seriously.

It's very broad in its definition of rape. It asks if consent was given but nothing about the use of force.

49% of all survey takers report being involved in at least one sexual encounter without their consent. Which leads us to the consent problem and how people have defined that word into nothing. If half of your subjects report having been involved in a "rape" or attempted "rape" then there's no point in taking it seriously.

I found the number of unreported rape cases in broader studies to be around 50%. This study comes in at 90%. The reason why is because they define rape so lightly. You know who is less likely to report a rape than a rape victim? Someone that hasn't been raped.

Some of you really hate women.

"We think it's terrible," said interim president and provost of the school Scott Coltrane.

Time to take the interim tag off. He's ready to lead for REAL.

On a more serious note, the title of the article is rather sexist.

Alexis said:

There's nothing funny about Rapier Wit.

But, even back in the 80s, when I was much younger and better looking, (not really) plenty of girls would love to get drunk at the house, end up in bed with some guy, end up half naked, and then decide that maybe they didn't want to have sex. And I think I speak for all when I say, it takes a special type of guy who can just turn it off at that time. And by special, I mean gay.

Did you ever try the old "I'll just put the head in". That worked for me a few times.

sarktastic said:

Does anyone else find it odd that the agrarian hippy school to the South has a president named Coal Train?

I know your just being sarkastic but I'm pretty sure you have no idea what agrarian means.

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Those aren't push-ups he's doing after scores...