You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games.
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching.
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching. I don't with agree that. They went toe to toe with Auburn. And that LSU game they lost because they had 4 turnovers and 12 penalties not because of athletic ability. They actually out gained LSU.
If UW played at Auburn I'd take GRCC give our road history in OOC games.
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching. I don't with agree that. They went toe to toe with Auburn. And that LSU game they lost because they had 4 turnovers and 12 penalties not because of athletic ability. They actually out gained LSU. Auburn left a lot on the field that day, and had one of the worst defenses in the SEC that year, yet they controlled the line of scrimmage against Oregon. And LSU physically had their way with Oregon, easily winning the game and leaving no doubt which team was the better. Oregon has had a lot of success lately, but they've struggled against teams with truly elite athletes, going back to the Rose Bowl vs Ohio State and as recently as last year vs Stanford. Their recent recruiting has been addressing this. The linemen they've been targeting and getting lately have the kind of size and power you'd expect to see at elite programs. My guess is Helfrich will continue down this path and they will be a better team as a result. By the way, what do you suppose the score was in the game below? Do the stats below really tell the story? Washington Miami Fla First downs 22 21 Rushed-yards 45-98 37-211 Passing yards 194 202 Sacked-yards lost 4-34 1-5 Return yards 10 94 Passes 17-36-6 15-24-1 Punts 3-34.3 2-44.5 Fumbles-lost 6-1 2-0 Penalties-yards 10-60 7-46 Time of possession 35:49 24:11
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching. I don't with agree that. They went toe to toe with Auburn. And that LSU game they lost because they had 4 turnovers and 12 penalties not because of athletic ability. They actually out gained LSU. UW outgained LSU in 2009... Still had no chance to win
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching. I don't with agree that. They went toe to toe with Auburn. And that LSU game they lost because they had 4 turnovers and 12 penalties not because of athletic ability. They actually out gained LSU. Auburn left a lot on the field that day, and had one of the worst defenses in the SEC that year, yet they controlled the line of scrimmage against Oregon. And LSU physically had their way with Oregon, easily winning the game and leaving no doubt which team was the better. Oregon has had a lot of success lately, but they've struggled against teams with truly elite athletes, going back to the Rose Bowl vs Ohio State and as recently as last year vs Stanford. Their recent recruiting has been addressing this. The linemen they've been targeting and getting lately have the kind of size and power you'd expect to see at elite programs. My guess is Helfrich will continue down this path and they will be a better team as a result. By the way, what do you suppose the score was in the game below? Do the stats below really tell the story? Washington Miami Fla First downs 22 21 Rushed-yards 45-98 37-211 Passing yards 194 202 Sacked-yards lost 4-34 1-5 Return yards 10 94 Passes 17-36-6 15-24-1 Punts 3-34.3 2-44.5 Fumbles-lost 6-1 2-0 Penalties-yards 10-60 7-46 Time of possession 35:49 24:11 Is that the Whammy in Miami game? I'm assuming so. Our offense didn't really do much just had the big play to Thomas then a pick six plus a recovery on special teams. I remember Kaufman was shut down.
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching. I don't with agree that. They went toe to toe with Auburn. And that LSU game they lost because they had 4 turnovers and 12 penalties not because of athletic ability. They actually out gained LSU. I will give you LSU, but the Auburn game not so much.They lost by 3, but Auburn's defensive line dominated that game. Anybody watching that game saw Auburn as the much better team. If they had played 10 times, Auburn would have won 9 and plunger raped Oregon in 5-6 of those nine wins. I knew we were in trouble when the teams first came on to the field. Comparing the two teams was like David vs. Goliath. My first words were, "Oh shit".Oregon is much bigger now than they were then, because Chip learned. Hopefully Helfrich doesn't fuck up a good thing.
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching. I don't with agree that. They went toe to toe with Auburn. And that LSU game they lost because they had 4 turnovers and 12 penalties not because of athletic ability. They actually out gained LSU. Auburn left a lot on the field that day, and had one of the worst defenses in the SEC that year, yet they controlled the line of scrimmage against Oregon. And LSU physically had their way with Oregon, easily winning the game and leaving no doubt which team was the better. Oregon has had a lot of success lately, but they've struggled against teams with truly elite athletes, going back to the Rose Bowl vs Ohio State and as recently as last year vs Stanford. Their recent recruiting has been addressing this. The linemen they've been targeting and getting lately have the kind of size and power you'd expect to see at elite programs. My guess is Helfrich will continue down this path and they will be a better team as a result. By the way, what do you suppose the score was in the game below? Do the stats below really tell the story? Washington Miami Fla First downs 22 21 Rushed-yards 45-98 37-211 Passing yards 194 202 Sacked-yards lost 4-34 1-5 Return yards 10 94 Passes 17-36-6 15-24-1 Punts 3-34.3 2-44.5 Fumbles-lost 6-1 2-0 Penalties-yards 10-60 7-46 Time of possession 35:49 24:11 Is that the Whammy in Miami game? I'm assuming so. Our offense didn't really do much just had the big play to Thomas then a pick six plus a recovery on special teams. I remember Kaufman was shut down. No, it was November 24, 2001, the worst football game I have ever attended, but you would be hard pressed to tell how bad it was from the stats. Final score, UW 7, Miami 65.
You may just want to pull for Oregon against Tennessee, and be thankful it isn't Alabama, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia, or Texas A&M. If that were the case, the Pac 12 would stand a good chance of losing both games. Oregon is not built to go toe to toe with most of the teams on that list. Kelly realized that after getting thrashed by LSU, even made the comment that they have a different kind of athlete down there. Interestingly, and in an odd way much like Don James, I believe he changed his recruiting after that SEC beat down. James had size and power without speed, Kelly had speed without power or size. James added speed, I think Kelly was in the process off adding power. Adaptation, one of the traits of great coaching. I don't with agree that. They went toe to toe with Auburn. And that LSU game they lost because they had 4 turnovers and 12 penalties not because of athletic ability. They actually out gained LSU. Auburn left a lot on the field that day, and had one of the worst defenses in the SEC that year, yet they controlled the line of scrimmage against Oregon. And LSU physically had their way with Oregon, easily winning the game and leaving no doubt which team was the better. Oregon has had a lot of success lately, but they've struggled against teams with truly elite athletes, going back to the Rose Bowl vs Ohio State and as recently as last year vs Stanford. Their recent recruiting has been addressing this. The linemen they've been targeting and getting lately have the kind of size and power you'd expect to see at elite programs. My guess is Helfrich will continue down this path and they will be a better team as a result. By the way, what do you suppose the score was in the game below? Do the stats below really tell the story? Washington Miami Fla First downs 22 21 Rushed-yards 45-98 37-211 Passing yards 194 202 Sacked-yards lost 4-34 1-5 Return yards 10 94 Passes 17-36-6 15-24-1 Punts 3-34.3 2-44.5 Fumbles-lost 6-1 2-0 Penalties-yards 10-60 7-46 Time of possession 35:49 24:11 Is that the Whammy in Miami game? I'm assuming so. Our offense didn't really do much just had the big play to Thomas then a pick six plus a recovery on special teams. I remember Kaufman was shut down. No, it was November 24, 2001, the worst football game I have ever attended, but you would be hard pressed to tell how bad it was from the stats. Final score, UW 7, Miami 65. Remember when giving up 65 points was an outrage that began the end for Rick? Now its a fucking résumé enhancer for Sark
90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+.
90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+. Actually Auburn recruits a lot of 3-star guys, even 2-star kids (which I could give a fuck less about. But, Auburn has stunk for two years, so maybe it does matter. I think WSU can beat them with their "3-star and 2-star turds
http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/commitments/2012/Auburn-75According to Rivals, this is the first year since 2010 that Auburn has recruited 2* players. About half of Auburns recruits are 4 star, so based on raw talent Auburn is Anderson Silva and WSU is Scott Voss. But let's not allow facts to get in the way.
http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/commitments/2012/Auburn-75According to Rivals, this is the first year since 2010 that Auburn has recruited 2* players. About half of Auburns recruits are 4 star, so based on raw talent Auburn is Anderson Silva and WSU is Scott Voss. But let's not allow facts to get in the way. Auburn dances around like a bunch of pussies?
Close but no cigarhttp://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-13/pac-10/2013-washington-state-cougars-football-schedule.phpoverrated $EC national runner up could barely handle mediocre Pac 12 team at home
90% of Auburn's roster is comprised of top 10 recruiting classes. Over half of WSU's is Wulff's. The lack of a semblance of even a mediocre offensive line results in more than just the first 6 inches of the plunger residing in crimson and gray rectum. Auburn by 20+. Actually Auburn recruits a lot of 3-star guys, even 2-star kids (which I could give a fuck less about. But, Auburn has stunk for two years, so maybe it does matter. I think WSU can beat them with their "3-star and 2-star turds Hmmmm, pump was right. WsU won that game, the refs of course wouldn't allow that...and what ya know, no return trip to Pullman..
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
