Pete Carroll is a once in a generation coach

Comments

• DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,197

  January 14

  I did!

  8 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,478

  January 14

  <--- Cunt.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,246

  January 14

  Huh?

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496

  January 14

  Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• AEB Member Posts: 2,972

  January 14

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.

  What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496

  January 14

  AEB said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.

  What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.

  One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.
  
  Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
  
  Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
  
  Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Postal91 Member Posts: 1,853

  January 14

  PurpleReign said:

  <--- Cunt.</p>

  Your arrow was pointing at my dog on the couch.. cunt

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,246

  January 14

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  AEB said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.

  What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.

  One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.
  
  Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
  
  Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
  
  Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways.

  I care and I think.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496

  January 14

  CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  AEB said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.

  What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.

  One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.
  
  Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
  
  Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
  
  Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways.

  I care and I think.

  Thanks, Thinker-of-Taft!
  

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,246

  January 14

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  AEB said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.

  What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.

  One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.
  
  Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
  
  Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
  
  Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways.

  I care and I think.

  Thanks, Thinker-of-Taft!
  

  GRUNDLE STOp. You’re making me blush.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496

  January 14

  CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  AEB said:

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.

  What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.

  One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.
  
  Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
  
  Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
  
  Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways.

  I care and I think.

  Thanks, Thinker-of-Taft!
  

  GRUNDLE STOp. You’re making me blush.

  Conserve that vascular flow, pod, you'll need it.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter