Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Pete Carroll is a once in a generation coach
pawz
Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,427 
Comments
-
I did!
-
<--- Cunt.
-
Huh?
-
Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.
-
What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.GrundleStiltzkin said:Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.
-
One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.AEB said:
What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.GrundleStiltzkin said:Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.
Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways. -
Your arrow was pointing at my dog on the couch.. cuntPurpleReign said:<--- Cunt.</p>
-
I care and I think.GrundleStiltzkin said:
One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.AEB said:
What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.GrundleStiltzkin said:Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.
Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways. -
Thanks, Thinker-of-Taft!CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I care and I think.GrundleStiltzkin said:
One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.AEB said:
What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.GrundleStiltzkin said:Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.
Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways.
-
GRUNDLE STOp. You’re making me blush.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Thanks, Thinker-of-Taft!CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I care and I think.GrundleStiltzkin said:
One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.AEB said:
What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.GrundleStiltzkin said:Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.
Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways. -
Conserve that vascular flow, pod, you'll need it.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
GRUNDLE STOp. You’re making me blush.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Thanks, Thinker-of-Taft!CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I care and I think.GrundleStiltzkin said:
One, I've always loathed Carroll. I am not a Twoolve and thus not swayed by his rehab stint in the neon-green and seafoam blue.AEB said:
What say you regarding this Carroll-tomdoogery? You seemed to have had the last two weeks dialed in.GrundleStiltzkin said:Ignore my raised hackles and suspicious growl at you're own expense.
Bringing in Carroll would be a bandaid, carpetbagger hire with an implicit expiration date, because he's old and also full of shit. I can recognize that enough people actually believe in this guym that it could, likely would, have some short term pop and get results. I don't think this is the way to build a program.
Smarter people than me are working on this, and I can imagine there are thoughtful, deliberate ways to craft a long term plan around having Carroll in the chair for a couple years. But, given the hiring time constraints, how much of a plan could be in place in 48 hours. Sure, adjustments can be made along the way, but I don't think big ones. Once the guy is in, gotta roll with him.
Whatever, no one cares what I think, nor should they. I'd probably enjoy individual wins with Carroll. But it's likely to be as ephemeral as Deboor, in different ways.
