Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Just what I'm hearing...

1810121314

Comments

  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,597 Swaye's Wigwam
    HFNY said:

    Whittingham fits traditional Husky Football (balanced offense, nasty on D) but what's his buyout?

    Two of his three wifes.
  • Postal91
    Postal91 Member Posts: 2,002

    Leipold

    Dude was a winner, and turned programs into winners. Wouldn’t be made at him. Plus his alma isn’t a D1.

    Fisch is Florida, but also has Michigan ties if I read that right. Khakis leaves and he fills after 2 here. Looking for someone primed to put a life down.
  • bigcc
    bigcc Member Posts: 900

    TheHB said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    I just want 8 years of stability. I feel like these older guys will stay until retirement. If UW needs to rebuild I want the coach who builds it to be here to coach the finished product and grow off that success.
    UW hasn't had an 8 year coach since 92 with Don, and only 4 fucking coaches since 1892 retard

    "derr all I want is 4 Steve emtmans"
  • Kingdome_Urinals
    Kingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,896
    Stability at UW should be making the playoff every year, or at least in a position to make it every November.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,778 Founders Club

    If Florida sucks next year, which they probably will (insane schedule), then the AD is gone and so is Napier.

    And then Fisch is gone after one year.

    No.

    So settle for mediocrity because a good coach will probably just leave us
    That's not what I said, but nice try
    That's the essence of what you're conveying
    No, it isn't.

    Fisch is a great coach but his alma mater is in the wilderness and that job has a 80% chance of opening up next year

    There are plenty of other good hires where that isn't the case.

    Whittingham, Pete Carroll, Petersen, Klieman
    3/4 you listed are old and probably wouldn’t be at UW long either.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,778 Founders Club

    Fisch brings Fajita and McMillan and you could do a lot worse than that as long as you can break the bank and get a big time DC

    Does Fajita come with a side of nachos? Aksin' for a fren.

    @CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    Better come with a fucking platter or I burn the stadium to the ground.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,778 Founders Club

    I’m going to be unhappy regardless of who it is so let’s get this over with.

    You may only have 90 posts, but you seem primed to settle in for a long tenure at Hardcore Husky.
    Didn’t you saw deboner was going to have a long tenure…
    I’m not Dutch.
    Fat?
    I know better than to step into Fetters’ domain.
    Smart move new fish.
  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,868 Founders Club

    TheHB said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    I just want 8 years of stability. I feel like these older guys will stay until retirement. If UW needs to rebuild I want the coach who builds it to be here to coach the finished product and grow off that success.
    What is stability? 7-9 wins?
    Was thinking an 8 win floor and playoffs every couple years.
  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,868 Founders Club
    bigcc said:

    TheHB said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    I just want 8 years of stability. I feel like these older guys will stay until retirement. If UW needs to rebuild I want the coach who builds it to be here to coach the finished product and grow off that success.
    UW hasn't had an 8 year coach since 92 with Don, and only 4 fucking coaches since 1892 retard

    "derr all I want is 4 Steve emtmans"
    The heart wants what the heart wants. Being a colossal fag such as yourself I thought you’d know that.