Jeff Choate
Comments
-
Proved what? Power five coaches who have proven what they need to prove are already coaching at places like Alabama.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. This doesn't move the needle at all for me.
We need a coach that has proven it at the P5 level.
This could easily be our WULFF equivalent.
It's almost like we didn't just have this discussion a couple of years ago when the majority wanted Matt Campbell or Dave Aranda.
I can see looking at the guys at the Kansas schools. They haven't proven anything at the power five level though. -
Define prove? Klieman won the conference last year.chuck said:
Proved what? Power five coaches who have proven what they need to prove are already coaching at places like Alabama.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. This doesn't move the needle at all for me.
We need a coach that has proven it at the P5 level.
This could easily be our WULFF equivalent.
It's almost like we didn't just have this discussion a couple of years ago when the majority wanted Matt Campbell or Dave Aranda.
I can see looking at the guys at the Kansas schools. They haven't proven anything at the power five level though.
-
Good point. Dumb comment by me.AtomicDawg said:
Define prove? Klieman won the conference last year.chuck said:
Proved what? Power five coaches who have proven what they need to prove are already coaching at places like Alabama.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. This doesn't move the needle at all for me.
We need a coach that has proven it at the P5 level.
This could easily be our WULFF equivalent.
It's almost like we didn't just have this discussion a couple of years ago when the majority wanted Matt Campbell or Dave Aranda.
I can see looking at the guys at the Kansas schools. They haven't proven anything at the power five level though. -
NoIslandDawg said:If looking at mountain west, why does Bobby Hauck’s name not get mentioned. The griz were better than Lake. And he has history coaching at UW.
-
I wasn't trying to be a dick. Just there are different levels of proving it. Both of those dudes in Kansas do it for me realistically based off of who uw could get. Not my top choices but could win big here.chuck said:
Good point. Dumb comment by me.AtomicDawg said:
Define prove? Klieman won the conference last year.chuck said:
Proved what? Power five coaches who have proven what they need to prove are already coaching at places like Alabama.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. This doesn't move the needle at all for me.
We need a coach that has proven it at the P5 level.
This could easily be our WULFF equivalent.
It's almost like we didn't just have this discussion a couple of years ago when the majority wanted Matt Campbell or Dave Aranda.
I can see looking at the guys at the Kansas schools. They haven't proven anything at the power five level though.
Klieman runs a very solid and what seems to be organized program.
Liopold from what I've seen runs a good program and schemes his balls off. -
I didn't think you were. I found it funny that I was kind of being a dick and kind of tripped over mine in the process.AtomicDawg said:
I wasn't trying to be a dick. Just there are different levels of proving it. Both of those dudes in Kansas do it for me realistically based off of who uw could get. Not my top choices but could win big here.chuck said:
Good point. Dumb comment by me.AtomicDawg said:
Define prove? Klieman won the conference last year.chuck said:
Proved what? Power five coaches who have proven what they need to prove are already coaching at places like Alabama.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. This doesn't move the needle at all for me.
We need a coach that has proven it at the P5 level.
This could easily be our WULFF equivalent.
It's almost like we didn't just have this discussion a couple of years ago when the majority wanted Matt Campbell or Dave Aranda.
I can see looking at the guys at the Kansas schools. They haven't proven anything at the power five level though.
Klieman runs a very solid and what seems to be organized program.
Liopold from what I've seen runs a good program and schemes his balls off.
I just disagree with pgos on the basic point. Proving it means winning. Winning at the level you're at is much stronger indication that you'll win at a higher level than possessing a track record of mediocrity at that higher level. -
Thisbiak1 said:Fuck Lynden forever anyway.
-
Sorry to @CallMeBigErn i missed itCallMeBigErn said:Big Ern was all over this yesterday. Let me know if y'all got a message I can deliver because he's probably 1.3 miles from me rn.
Going to be a rockstar hire for Nevada. Not sure if he's UW material at this point, but I could probably be convinced. He's a dude. He's on the KD at Fresno track. -
Oh it wasn't meant that wayJoeEDangerously said:
Sorry to @CallMeBigErn i missed itCallMeBigErn said:Big Ern was all over this yesterday. Let me know if y'all got a message I can deliver because he's probably 1.3 miles from me rn.
Going to be a rockstar hire for Nevada. Not sure if he's UW material at this point, but I could probably be convinced. He's a dude. He's on the KD at Fresno track. -
This would fit on a beer glass.chuck said:
Good point. Dumb comment by me.AtomicDawg said:
Define prove? Klieman won the conference last year.chuck said:
Proved what? Power five coaches who have proven what they need to prove are already coaching at places like Alabama.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. This doesn't move the needle at all for me.
We need a coach that has proven it at the P5 level.
This could easily be our WULFF equivalent.
It's almost like we didn't just have this discussion a couple of years ago when the majority wanted Matt Campbell or Dave Aranda.
I can see looking at the guys at the Kansas schools. They haven't proven anything at the power five level though.






