Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

How mad is the B1G?

EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,491
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
Founders Club
They just added another Rutgers.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,488
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club

    They just added another Rutgers.

    @Sandra6
  • Options
    DoogmanRefundDoogmanRefund Member Posts: 761
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
  • Options
    TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,368
    First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Swaye's Wigwam
    ESPN behind all of this.
  • Options
    Sandra6Sandra6 Member Posts: 147
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    edited January 12
    Well, we probably could have afforded to keep DeBoer if the BIG was even giving us something like 65% shares rather than 50% shares. The BIG has nobody to blame for this but themselves. The BIG played that stupid footsies game with Oregon and Washington for more than a year with the deliberate purpose of wrecking the PAC 12-2 media deal and leaving us with no leverage to get better than 50% shares.

    According to reports, we offered De Boer $9 million before possible bonuses. $10 million is the new coaching standard nowadays. If we could have afforded to give him just $1 million more, we probably would have kept him.
  • Options
    BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,586
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club
    Sandra6 said:

    Well, we probably could have afforded to keep DeBoer if the BIG was even giving us something like 65% shares rather than 50% shares. The BIG has nobody to blame for this but themselves. The BIG played that stupid footsies game with Oregon and Washington for more than a year with the deliberate purpose of wrecking the PAC 12-2 media deal and leaving us with no leverage to get better than 50% shares.

    According to reports, we offered De Boer $9 million before possible bonuses. $10 million is the new coaching standard nowadays. If we could have afforded to give him just $1 million more, we probably would have kept him.

    That's such bs. If you can afford $9 mil, you can afford $10. That should be couch cushion change.
  • Options
    dtddtd Member Posts: 4,104
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    It sucks but UW is going to be fine. WISCONSIN runs a division in that league.
  • Options
    Sandra6Sandra6 Member Posts: 147
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    edited January 12

    Sandra6 said:

    Well, we probably could have afforded to keep DeBoer if the BIG was even giving us something like 65% shares rather than 50% shares. The BIG has nobody to blame for this but themselves. The BIG played that stupid footsies game with Oregon and Washington for more than a year with the deliberate purpose of wrecking the PAC 12-2 media deal and leaving us with no leverage to get better than 50% shares.

    According to reports, we offered De Boer $9 million before possible bonuses. $10 million is the new coaching standard nowadays. If we could have afforded to give him just $1 million more, we probably would have kept him.

    That's such bs. If you can afford $9 mil, you can afford $10. That should be couch cushion change.

    Well, maybe Alabama is setting some new coaching standard by paying him $12 million or $13 million. I don't know. All I know is that 1. Ross Delenger reported that we were offering De Boer $9 million 2. Currently, no college football coach makes more than $10 million 3. Apparently De Boer didn't think our offer to him was high enough.

    For in case you're not aware, once you subtract the extra $10 million in travel costs, we're going to make exactly the same money in our first 6 years in the Big Ten that we would have made with that crappy $20 million Amazon deal that Kliavkoff ultimately offered. We don't have some infinite money like other BIG schools do.
  • Options
    BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,586
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club
    Sandra6 said:

    Sandra6 said:

    Well, we probably could have afforded to keep DeBoer if the BIG was even giving us something like 65% shares rather than 50% shares. The BIG has nobody to blame for this but themselves. The BIG played that stupid footsies game with Oregon and Washington for more than a year with the deliberate purpose of wrecking the PAC 12-2 media deal and leaving us with no leverage to get better than 50% shares.

    According to reports, we offered De Boer $9 million before possible bonuses. $10 million is the new coaching standard nowadays. If we could have afforded to give him just $1 million more, we probably would have kept him.

    That's such bs. If you can afford $9 mil, you can afford $10. That should be couch cushion change.

    Well, maybe Alabama is setting some new coaching standard by paying him $12 million or $13 million. I don't know. All I know is that 1. Ross Delenger reported that we were offering De Boer $9 million 2. Currently, no college football coach makes more than $10 million 3. Apparently De Boer didn't think our offer to him was high enough.

    For in case you're not aware, once you subtract the extra $10 million in travel costs, we're going to make exactly the same money in our first 6 years in the Big Ten that we would have made with that crappy $20 million Amazon deal that Kliavkoff ultimately offered. We don't have some infinite money like other BIG schools do.
    I don't think it was all about the money.
  • Options
    FireTheJanitorFireTheJanitor Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,483
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment First Anniversary
    Founders Club
    gmo said:

    Sandra6 said:

    Sandra6 said:

    Well, we probably could have afforded to keep DeBoer if the BIG was even giving us something like 65% shares rather than 50% shares. The BIG has nobody to blame for this but themselves. The BIG played that stupid footsies game with Oregon and Washington for more than a year with the deliberate purpose of wrecking the PAC 12-2 media deal and leaving us with no leverage to get better than 50% shares.

    According to reports, we offered De Boer $9 million before possible bonuses. $10 million is the new coaching standard nowadays. If we could have afforded to give him just $1 million more, we probably would have kept him.

    That's such bs. If you can afford $9 mil, you can afford $10. That should be couch cushion change.

    Well, maybe Alabama is setting some new coaching standard by paying him $12 million or $13 million. I don't know. All I know is that 1. Ross Delenger reported that we were offering De Boer $9 million 2. Currently, no college football coach makes more than $10 million 3. Apparently De Boer didn't think our offer to him was high enough.

    not that hard... just offer him the $12M... more than anyone in the country. Neuheisel style.
    fucking idiots for not doing that weeks ago. $3M difference? Who gives a fuck....
    I’m almost positive UW fans spent close to $100M to go to Vegas, NOLA, and Houston games.

    BuDGetS!
  • Options
    no_uhno_uh Member Posts: 760
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    If it's about the money, surely they aren't too stupid to realize that a half-full stadium is bad.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,687
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Its always about money

    Always
  • Options
    RTDRTD Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 787
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
    Founders Club
    "Dawgs don't play no shit, ya, ya feel me?!? Dawgs never been about that, never NEVER been about playin no shit."
  • Options
    TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,368
    First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Yeah, it was about the money -- money for players and staff.
  • Options
    Sandra6Sandra6 Member Posts: 147
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    dtd said:

    It sucks but UW is going to be fine. WISCONSIN runs a division in that league.

    Iowa won that division last year, and Wisconsin last won the division in 2019. Wisconsin didn't dominate the division. The only constants with that division were 1. Nobody dominated the division, and it was unpredictable who would win the division every year 2. Nebraska would finish at or near the bottom of the division, despite being the division's "blue blood" program 3. The division winner would be at best about the 25th best team in the country, and would be lucky to lose by 21 points to the East Division champion.

    The Big Ten is getting rid of divisions next year, for in case you're not aware.
  • Options
    PineapplePiratePineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,012
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    B1G doesn’t give a shit. UW was an afterthought.
  • Options
    TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,368
    First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Swaye's Wigwam
    You know you're in a shitty situation when the cuog on KJR are pissed off that DeBoer left.

    And for a guy who went 25-3, he's leaving the cupboard fucking bare.

    UW in the B1G will look like WSU in the Pac-12 -- for years, I'm afraid.
Sign In or Register to comment.