He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
You didn't answer the question
I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.
But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.
Tyrone,,the poster boy for ineptness as a head coach was given how many years by the fans? The Husky halfbrain movement began over that idiot's continued employment and fan support for him. So let's see, Peterman will get....five years to win the 6. Maybe 10.
He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
You didn't answer the question
I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.
But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.
He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
You didn't answer the question
I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.
But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.
How long does he get?
More than one game. You gave Sark five years
Answer the question. How long do you give him?
Personally, four years unless he's terrible in three. But I'm much more willing to give a coach with a track record the benefit of the doubt than I am a coach who's never done shit (Sark), or worse yet, been shit at other stops (Gilbyham).
Comments