Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Even if Stanford isn't great, they might still be one of the 5 best teams Pete has played against
uzi
Member Posts: 1,298
Looking back at coach Pete's record, just how many wins does he have against top 25 caliber teams? Oregon in Chip's first year? Oklahoma in the Fiesta? Georgia a couple of years ago (don't recall if they were a top 25 team back then), TCU... who else?
Sure he is 100 and 13 or something like that, but how much experience does he have facing off against teams like Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, and USC every year?
How many years does he get to win more than 6 games a year in the Pac 12?
Comments
-
We've gone over this...
-
You really need to PM Irishdawg
-
So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?TTJ said:We've gone over this...
-
-
-
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
-
olololouzi said: -
Found the link for you since you are lazy:uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=chris+petersen+top+25+wins -
Nobody falls for you links. Hills...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Found the link for you since you are lazy:uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=chris+petersen+top+25+wins -
Your question is completely irrelevant. Art Briles and Gus Malzahn were high school coaches, and look at them now. Nick Saban was the coach at Toledo at one point. Don James- Kent State. Jim Tressel- Youngstown State. Brian Kelly- some directional Michigan school(Central, I think), then Cincinatti. Jim Harbaugh was at USD. Urban Meyer- Bowling Green. Kevin Sumlin- Houston. Coaches get jobs at better schools in better conferences all the time. Good coaches win. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year? -
Three years, at best.uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year? -
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year? -
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.RaceBannon said:
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year? -
I hope this is correct, but I'm still not overly confident in Pool Boy. This probably deserves its own thread, but I think that Woodward would have tried to keep Sark if not for all his off the field bullshit. I could be wrong, but I think he was satisfied with the "progress" Sark was making on the field.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Three years, at best.uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year? -
No way Pete gets fewer years than Sark or Ty. The athletic department also sees Pete as how they want to represent the university value wise, regardless of performance. Don't underestimate that.EsophagealFeces said:
I hope this is correct, but I'm still not overly confident in Pool Boy. This probably deserves its own thread, but I think that Woodward would have tried to keep Sark if not for all his off the field bullshit. I could be wrong, but I think he was satisfied with the "progress" Sark was making on the field.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Three years, at best.uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
-
You didn't answer the questionuzi said:
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.RaceBannon said:
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year? -
I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.RaceBannon said:
You didn't answer the questionuzi said:
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.RaceBannon said:
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.
How long does he get? -
I meant to mention that in my poast, but forgot to. I think you're exactly right. I fear that the current administration is far more concerned with that than they are with winning.WilburHooksHands said:
The athletic department also sees Pete as how they want to represent the university value wise, regardless of performance. Don't underestimate that.EsophagealFeces said:
I hope this is correct, but I'm still not overly confident in Pool Boy. This probably deserves its own thread, but I think that Woodward would have tried to keep Sark if not for all his off the field bullshit. I could be wrong, but I think he was satisfied with the "progress" Sark was making on the field.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Three years, at best.uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year? -
BUUUURRRRRNuzi said: -
-
More than one game. You gave Sark five yearsuzi said:
I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.RaceBannon said:
You didn't answer the questionuzi said:
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.RaceBannon said:
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.
How long does he get? -
Tyrone,,the poster boy for ineptness as a head coach was given how many years by the fans? The Husky halfbrain movement began over that idiot's continued employment and fan support for him. So let's see, Peterman will get....five years to win the 6. Maybe 10.
-
Answer the question. How long do you give him?RaceBannon said:
More than one game. You gave Sark five yearsuzi said:
I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.RaceBannon said:
You didn't answer the questionuzi said:
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.RaceBannon said:
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.
How long does he get? -
Brah, maybe before you crown Staford a top 5 team against Peterman you should let the season play out. They are 1-1 and got beat by Seven.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
Personally, four years unless he's terrible in three. But I'm much more willing to give a coach with a track record the benefit of the doubt than I am a coach who's never done shit (Sark), or worse yet, been shit at other stops (Gilbyham).uzi said:
Answer the question. How long do you give him?RaceBannon said:
More than one game. You gave Sark five yearsuzi said:
I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.RaceBannon said:
You didn't answer the questionuzi said:
Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.RaceBannon said:
Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?uzi said:
Okay, well at least you responded to the content.EsophagealFeces said:
Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.
How long does he get?
-
Arguing that Furd is worse isn't making Pete's case better.Disciple_2_Hole said:
Brah, maybe before you crown Staford a top 5 team against Peterman you should let the season play out. They are 1-1 and got beat by Seven.uzi said:
That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
15 games, or gtfo.
-
Uzi is proving why you don't let children play with guns.
