If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe" Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary (YT video has a little different Into)
Fuck these people and the people that voted in the retard who let them in here
Islam is not compatible with Western values. People either wake the fuck up or the feminists will all be in burkas enjoying their daily rapings 30 - 40 years from now.
If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe" Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary (YT video has a little different Into)
If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe" Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary (YT video has a little different Into)
I've watched the video you posted years ago.... that was thoroughly debunked then.
No it wasn't, these films weren't out when the original article came out and it nowhere cites any of the 3 documentaries nor does the 2017 article
You have now changed your story. ..previously you told me you didn't need to because popular mechanics debunked it, now you say you watched it years ago. I've tried to get you to watch several times and you have NEVER said you already seen them. You just make excuses.
You haven't watched the video , clearly you just don't want to and will believe whatever you're told to believe.... and you should never serve jury duty.
I've watched the video you posted years ago.... that was thoroughly debunked then.
No it wasn't, these films weren't out when the original article came out and it nowhere cites any of the 3 documentaries nor does the 2017 article
You have now changed your story. ..previously you told me you didn't need to because popular mechanics debunked it, now you say you watched it years ago. I've tried to get you to watch several times and you have NEVER said you already seen them. You just make excuses.
You haven't watched the video , clearly you just don't want to and will believe whatever you're told to believe.... and you should never serve jury duty.
If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe" Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary (YT video has a little different Into)
I've watched the video you posted years ago.... that was thoroughly debunked then.
No it wasn't, these films weren't out when the original article came out and it nowhere cites any of the 3 documentaries nor does the 2017 article
You have now changed your story. ..previously you told me you didn't need to because popular mechanics debunked it, now you say you watched it years ago. I've tried to get you to watch several times and you have NEVER said you already seen them. You just make excuses.
You haven't watched the video , clearly you just don't want to and will believe whatever you're told to believe.... and you should never serve jury duty.
Yes i looked into the architects years ago... this isn't new. And it has been debunked numerous times.
If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe" Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary (YT video has a little different Into)
Read the article... it warped because of the hest (sic) in the northwest side.
Jesus Christ.
In the history of concrete and steel construction, do you know how many structures world-wide have failed due to fire (aka heat)?
Spoiler: Only 3. All on the same day. Two had the shaky excuse of jet fuel, or something. This building certainly did not.
Second, if heat initially impacted one specific side of the building, why didn't the building fall over that way?
It fell in on itself. Perfectly. As if it was drawn up.
So, when it fell in on itself, it was so "hot" the exterior/perimeter support elements stayed in place but instead melted the core/elevator shaft first? A crucial element to having a building fall in on itself.
Nevermind the fact the fire in this building did not have the added benefit of "jet fuel" (aka kerosene).
Do you understand how fucking stupid that logic is?
Fuck what some asshole in a magazine has to say, you can see the collapse with your own eyes. There is video. Also a simple google search will teach you about the basics of controlled demolition.
If merely taking somebody's word for it is good enough for you, well, congratulations. I need to see the facts for myself.
If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe" Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary (YT video has a little different Into)
Read the article... it warped because of the hest (sic) in the northwest side.
Jesus Christ.
In the history of concrete and steel construction, do you know how many structures world-wide have failed due to fire (aka heat)?
Spoiler: Only 3. All on the same day. Two had the shaky excuse of jet fuel, or something. This building certainly did not.
Second, if heat initially impacted one specific side of the building, why didn't the building fall over that way?
It fell in on itself. Perfectly. As if it was drawn up.
When it fell in on itself, it was so "hot" the exterior/perimeter support elements stayed in place but instead melted the core/elevator shaft first?
Nevermind the fact the fire in this building did not have the added benefit of "jet fuel" (aka kerosene).
Do you understand how fucking stupid that logic is?
Fuck what some asshole in a magazine has to say, you can see the collapse with your own eyes. There is video. Also a simple google search will teach you about the basics of controlled demolition.
If merely taking somebody's word for it is good enough for you, well, congratulations. I need to see the facts for myself.
If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe" Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary (YT video has a little different Into)
Read the article... it warped because of the hest (sic) in the northwest side.
Jesus Christ.
In the history of concrete and steel construction, do you know how many structures world-wide have failed due to fire (aka heat)?
Spoiler: Only 3. All on the same day. Two had the shaky excuse of jet fuel, or something. This building certainly did not.
Second, if heat initially impacted one specific side of the building, why didn't the building fall over that way?
It fell in on itself. Perfectly. As if it was drawn up.
When it fell in on itself, it was so "hot" the exterior/perimeter support elements stayed in place but instead melted the core/elevator shaft first?
Nevermind the fact the fire in this building did not have the added benefit of "jet fuel" (aka kerosene).
Do you understand how fucking stupid that logic is?
Fuck what some asshole in a magazine has to say, you can see the collapse with your own eyes. There is video. Also a simple google search will teach you about the basics of controlled demolition.
If merely taking somebody's word for it is good enough for you, well, congratulations. I need to see the facts for myself.
So you didn't read the article.... got it.
Why? Your explanation of heat on one side of the building was not in the article? Then why did you say so?
I'm employing elementary logic to Occam's Razor. The explanation you are positing does not..
I've watched the video you posted years ago.... that was thoroughly debunked then.
No it wasn't, these films weren't out when the original article came out and it nowhere cites any of the 3 documentaries nor does the 2017 article
You have now changed your story. ..previously you told me you didn't need to because popular mechanics debunked it, now you say you watched it years ago. I've tried to get you to watch several times and you have NEVER said you already seen them. You just make excuses.
You haven't watched the video , clearly you just don't want to and will believe whatever you're told to believe.... and you should never serve jury duty.
Yes i looked into the architects years ago... this isn't new. And it has been debunked numerous times.
Pffft...
You looked into? That's different from "I watched the documentary" which you've never said before!
You are now making it up.
IIRC The article from 2017 is the same one I asked you to post and I had to go look for the original that you wouldn't post..
Went over this last time but you disappeared.
Look don't watch the video if you don't want to but dont lie about it. It's more than obvious you haven't otherwise you would have real arguments and specific concerns over what you found wrong in the documentary.
We could have an intelligent discussion then but You think its all tin foil hat bullshit and say its all debunked from an article pushing the NIST narrative without looking for yourself .
Comments
I challenge YOU to watch these videos
If you disagree with the experts or content and conclusions in these videos, at least you took the time to consider and I give you a +1
If you dont want to watch the videos because you think you already know everything or are just too lazy then you are probably someone who buys everything the government and MSM tells you like "100% effective 100% safe"
Good luck and I suggest you do not serve jury duty because someones life depends on YOU to objectively look at ALL of the evidence...not just what you want to believe.
Some of these videos are blocked on YT and can only be found on the waybackmachine or Bitchute...
"Seven" documentary
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8CeRGYK20GLO/
Interview with Dr Leroy Hulsey from the video above
(Watch Seven documentary first link above)
From...
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth
"Over 40 experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share their professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11. Additionally, 8 psychological experts discuss why proving controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers can be so difficult for individuals to accept."
If you don't like Bitchute you can use the Youtube link below for this documentary
(YT video has a little different Into)
9/11 Explosive evidence, Experts speak out...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vBv3u4eTpt5z/
Or
9/11 In Plane Sight
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hlqRedlj4DKg/
Safe and effective.
Fuck these people and the people that voted in the retard who let them in here
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
Until it wasn’t.
Christ.
You have now changed your story.
..previously you told me you didn't need to because popular mechanics debunked it, now you say you watched it years ago.
I've tried to get you to watch several times and you have NEVER said you already seen them. You just make excuses.
You haven't watched the video , clearly you just don't want to and will believe whatever you're told to believe.... and you should never serve jury duty.
In the history of concrete and steel construction, do you know how many structures world-wide have failed due to fire (aka heat)?
Spoiler: Only 3. All on the same day. Two had the shaky excuse of jet fuel, or something. This building certainly did not.
Second, if heat initially impacted one specific side of the building, why didn't the building fall over that way?
It fell in on itself. Perfectly. As if it was drawn up.
So, when it fell in on itself, it was so "hot" the exterior/perimeter support elements stayed in place but instead melted the core/elevator shaft first? A crucial element to having a building fall in on itself.
Nevermind the fact the fire in this building did not have the added benefit of "jet fuel" (aka kerosene).
Do you understand how fucking stupid that logic is?
Fuck what some asshole in a magazine has to say, you can see the collapse with your own eyes. There is video. Also a simple google search will teach you about the basics of controlled demolition.
If merely taking somebody's word for it is good enough for you, well, congratulations. I need to see the facts for myself.
I'm employing elementary logic to Occam's Razor. The explanation you are positing does not..
You looked into? That's different from "I watched the documentary" which you've never said before!
You are now making it up.
IIRC The article from 2017 is the same one I asked you to post and I had to go look for the original that you wouldn't post..
Went over this last time but you disappeared.
Look don't watch the video if you don't want to but dont lie about it.
It's more than obvious you haven't otherwise you would have real arguments and specific concerns over what you found wrong in the documentary.
We could have an intelligent discussion then but
You think its all tin foil hat bullshit and say its all debunked from an article pushing the NIST narrative without looking for yourself .
Not wasting anymore time trying to help you.
DTM!