Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How will we ever beat Mighty Tejas?

145791013

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,593 Standard Supporter
    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
  • Quietcowskee
    Quietcowskee Member Posts: 4,209 Standard Supporter
    Worthy will beat the 3rd best receiver from Fresno on the field, behind McMillan and Giles.



    Nuff said on that.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    edited December 2023

    PurpleJ said:

    Worthy probably wouldn’t even start on our team.

    I can't think of any Texas players that could
    I’d take SWEAT and I think Ewers would make a decent understudy for Penix. Scrappy lunch pail guy who I’d be okay with railing my daughter.
  • Dahobbs
    Dahobbs Member Posts: 34
    chuck said:

    Watching some game highlights is making me feel better and better about this matchup. The Texas OL can be had. Fat, slow movers prone to complete jailbreaks in pass protection. They're a classic Sarkisian OL that can get rolling if you sit back and let them but are very vulnerable to quick penetration and disrupted plays.

    I don't think that describes our offensive line at all. If anything, their strength is athletic ability and ability to move in space. We got some size, but we don't overpower at the line of scrimmage. One of the real strengths of this line is getting our in space with our screen game.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    Dahobbs said:

    chuck said:

    Watching some game highlights is making me feel better and better about this matchup. The Texas OL can be had. Fat, slow movers prone to complete jailbreaks in pass protection. They're a classic Sarkisian OL that can get rolling if you sit back and let them but are very vulnerable to quick penetration and disrupted plays.

    I don't think that describes our offensive line at all. If anything, their strength is athletic ability and ability to move in space. We got some size, but we don't overpower at the line of scrimmage. One of the real strengths of this line is getting our in space with our screen game.
    They looked plodding to me. Yes they get out there but they look slow and unathletic doing it, at least compared to UWs line.

    Opinions are bound to vary and can be clouded by bias, just not mine (faggy wink).
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,332
    edited December 2023

    Dahobbs said:

    Canadawg said:



    Did you miss our QB at the Heisman event on Saturday? Or the fact that we have 3 WRs better than your best one? Our oline has allowed less than half the sacks. Our RB is a bully. They all played hurt for half the year btw. Do you have Gronk 2.0?

    You like your team, I get it. It is a really good team. But come on, if you want to have a real football discussion, you have to keep some perspective. You do not have three receivers better than Worthy. He is going in the first round in the draft. Adonai Mitchell is probably slated as a late day 2 pick right now, similar to McMillan, although he could improve on that if he comes back another year.

    As to Gronk 2.0, Ja'Tavion Sanders is widely recognized as the second best TE in college football after Brock Browers and will be a first or very early second round draft pick. He is athletic, has a great catching radius, and is almost automatic on any ball thrown in his general area.

    At RB, Brooks was likely going to win the Doak Walker before he got hurt. Baxter and Blue have filled in nicely for him since then. Baxter should be the more powerful back with a high upside, but he is freshman still struggling a bit to find his footing. Blue is speedster with a good amount of inside running ability for his size.

    As to sacks, your oline is very good in pass protection. However, I think a lot of the difference in sack numbers is QB awareness. Ewers at times this season would navigate the pocket poorly. He also has a tendency to hold on to the ball at times rather than taking the easy passes underneath. He has done better at that his last two games, so maybe the light is finally coming on a bit. We will see.
    i usually have to take a pretty long walk on the beach for perspective

    btw you didn’t mention our WR3 who also had a better season than worthy



    That is what shitdicks from Texas describe as a good wide receiver?

    This guy (poster) certainly ain't a steer.

    @dahobbs, You like your team, I get it. It is a really good team. But come on, if you want to have a real football discussion, you have to keep some perspective.

    BTW, congrats on jumping on the Sark train within the past couple of months. If you pay attention to actual football for more than three months your understanding of said subject matter will increase exponentially.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club
    Dahobbs said:

    chuck said:

    Watching some game highlights is making me feel better and better about this matchup. The Texas OL can be had. Fat, slow movers prone to complete jailbreaks in pass protection. They're a classic Sarkisian OL that can get rolling if you sit back and let them but are very vulnerable to quick penetration and disrupted plays.

    I don't think that describes our offensive line at all. If anything, their strength is athletic ability and ability to move in space. We got some size, but we don't overpower at the line of scrimmage. One of the real strengths of this line is getting our in space with our screen game.
    Sounds like there's a good chance UW will stuff your run game and bother Ewers. Again.

    Sark needs to prove he belongs. This is his first 1 loss season ever.

    DeBoer, not so much.
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,679 Founders Club
    edited December 2023
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…
    Keep gargling Saban's sack!
    Hey hamburger, y’all love to twist. I’m a Bama fan now, rite??
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…
    Keep gargling Saban's sack!
    Hey hamburger, y’all love to twist. I’m a Bama fan now, rite??
    Yep
    Whose winning the Oregon/Liberty game?
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,309 Founders Club
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…
    Keep gargling Saban's sack!
    Hey hamburger, y’all love to twist. I’m a Bama fan now, rite??
    Yep
    Whose winning the Oregon/Liberty game?
    Oregon

    What bearing does it have on anything?
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…
    Keep gargling Saban's sack!
    Hey hamburger, y’all love to twist. I’m a Bama fan now, rite??
    Yep
    Whose winning the Oregon/Liberty game?
    Oregon

    What bearing does it have on anything?
    So you’re an Oregon fan now. Awesome.
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,309 Founders Club
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…
    Keep gargling Saban's sack!
    Hey hamburger, y’all love to twist. I’m a Bama fan now, rite??
    Yep
    Whose winning the Oregon/Liberty game?
    Oregon

    What bearing does it have on anything?
    So you’re an Oregon fan now. Awesome.
    No, but you gargle SEC sack. It's okay. You're SECDWAG after all.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,593 Standard Supporter
    SECDAWG said:

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…

  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    TheHB said:

    Could be a 16-10 kind of game.

    But Bama isn’t losing to Michigan.

    Bammer struggled with South Florida. It's not the Bammer of the 2010s. They shouldn't even be anywhere near the playoffs.
    Screen shots taken…
    Keep gargling Saban's sack!
    Hey hamburger, y’all love to twist. I’m a Bama fan now, rite??
    Yep
    Whose winning the Oregon/Liberty game?
    Oregon

    What bearing does it have on anything?
    So you’re an Oregon fan now. Awesome.
    No, but you gargle SEC sack. It's okay. You're SECDWAG after all.
    Twist and “be funny” to the masses all you want. You said Oregon.

    This ain’t hard, pod. I agree with you. And I know you’re not an Oregon fan. But just because I say an SEC team, like Bama, is going to win it all, like I’ve said, does not mean I’m a Bama fan. I did just like you just did and the rest of these fucking hammereds, I picked who I THINK IS FUCKING WINNING…

    Does not mean I’m no more of a Bammerfan as you are A Duck fan.

    This is so simple. Stop the twisting. Hope I proved my point.

    Bama is winning it all. They shouldn’t have beat GA but they did. They shouldn’t have been in the CFP but they are.

    They’re about to rename the NC trophy the “Saban Trophy “

    It hurts me as much as you. But that’s what’s about to happen and it ain’t caus you or me likes it.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    IOW, I predicted my team and you yours.

    All of the Sudden I’m a Saban ball gargler but you’re not a Duck .

    Puh.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004


    Hurtful.

    Ought to bode well.


    Hey, get ready for another SEC championship.

    Take you pills now.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,161
    SECDAWG said:

    IOW, I predicted my team and you yours.

    All of the Sudden I’m a Saban ball gargler but you’re not a Duck .

    Puh.

    Pod you get some credit here, but you becoming a tidepod is lame. Puh?
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    IOW, I predicted my team and you yours.

    All of the Sudden I’m a Saban ball gargler but you’re not a Duck .

    Puh.

    Pod you get some credit here, but you becoming a tidepod is lame. Puh?
    Huh?

    Explain where I’m wrong or came off that way, specifically, other than pissing in some cheerios..
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    IOW, I predicted my team and you yours.

    All of the Sudden I’m a Saban ball gargler but you’re not a Duck .

    Puh.

    Pod you get some credit here, but you becoming a tidepod is lame. Puh?
    Huh?

    Explain where I’m wrong or came off that way, specifically, other than pissing in some cheerios..

  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    edited December 2023

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    IOW, I predicted my team and you yours.

    All of the Sudden I’m a Saban ball gargler but you’re not a Duck .

    Puh.

    Pod you get some credit here, but you becoming a tidepod is lame. Puh?
    Huh?

    Explain where I’m wrong or came off that way, specifically, other than pissing in some cheerios..

    No, why, No I won’t. Until y’all tell me where I’m wrong instead of butthurt.
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    IOW, I predicted my team and you yours.

    All of the Sudden I’m a Saban ball gargler but you’re not a Duck .

    Puh.

    Pod you get some credit here, but you becoming a tidepod is lame. Puh?
    Huh?

    Explain where I’m wrong or came off that way, specifically, other than pissing in some cheerios..

    No, why, No I won’t. Until y’all tell me where I’m wrong instead of butthurt.