The lib elites love the misery.

You still hear rat elites claiming they are for the working class. It's a lie of course. They look down on the working class with zero pity because they know most blue collar these days are voting Republican. It's the cruelty of socialists, you are either on the plantation or screw you. The other cruelty by rats is their bigotry and racism. I don't need to bring up campus liberals and their hatred of Jews, the elected rats who are clearly Jew haters, the support of hamas by the msm, etc.....

If you look at the historical stats, the field is no longer level. The money has firmly gone to the rats. Wallstreet, lawyers, hollywood, all gone socialist.

This article is written by a rat. He calls it as he see's it, which I give him credit for. That idiot biden keeps on touting his economy while the middle class suffers. Classic rat lack of concern for others, especially if those others don't agree with their socialistic bent politics.

The kicker is that rat money is voting for those that kill the middle class because it is financially beneficial to them. So when you hear a rat tell you that they are for the "little people", just know, they are a fucking liar.\

https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/class-conflict-and-the-democratic

Two decades ago, sociologists Jeff Manza and Clem Brooks observed that “professionals have moved from being the most Republican class in the 1950s, to the second most Democratic class by the late 1980s and the most Democratic class in 1996.” This consolidation has only grown even more pronounced in the intervening years. As professionals have increasingly clustered in the Democratic Party, moreover, they’ve grown increasingly progressive, particularly on “cultural” issues surrounding sexuality, race, gender, environmentalism—and especially when compared with blue-collar workers.

Federal Election Commission campaign contribution data provides stark insights into just how strongly knowledge economy professionals have aligned themselves with the Democratic Party in recent cycles. In 2016, roughly nine out of ten political donations from those who work as activists or in the arts, academia, and journalism were given to Democrats. Similarly, Democrats received around 80 percent of donations from workers involved in research, entertainment, non-profits, and science. They also received more than two-thirds of donations from those in information technology, law, engineering, public relations, or civil service jobs. Among industries that skewed Democratic, the party’s highest total contributions came from lawyers and law firms, environmental political action committees, non-profits, the education sector, the entertainment sector, consulting, and publishing.

Similar patterns held in 2020: the occupations and employers with the largest number of workers who donated to the Biden-Harris campaign included teachers, educators and professors, lawyers, medical and psychiatric professionals, people who work in advertising, communications and entertainment, consultants, human resources professionals and administrators, architects and designers, IT specialists and engineers. Industries that provided the highest total contributions to the Democrats included securities and investment, education, lawyers and law firms, health professionals, non-profits, electronics companies, business services, entertainment, and civil service. Geographically speaking, Democratic votes in 2020 were tightly clustered in major cities and college towns where knowledge economy professionals live and work—and outside those zones, it was largely a sea of red.

For instance, professionals tend to be far more supportive of immigration, globalization, automation, and artificial intelligence than most Americans because they make professionals’ lives more convenient and significantly lower the costs of the premium goods and services they are inclined towards. Those in knowledge professions primarily see upsides with respect to these issues because their lifestyles and livelihoods are much less at risk—indeed, they instead capture a disproportionate share of any resultant GDP increases—and their culture and values are largely affirmed rather than threatened by these phenomena. Others may and often do experience these developments quite differently.